I didn’t think I’d get into it this early, but I’ve
already listened to a few people previewing the LSU-Alabama game.
I don’t know what their problem is, but I made a very thorough comment in response to College Football Nerds (CFN). I said right up front that I think either team could win by multiple scores (and therefore picking Alabama to win by 6-10 points, which they did, could well be correct).
I’ll quote the exchange in full below; but to summarize, I pointed out that it’s hard to know just how good Alabama’s passing attack is given the schedule. I also mentioned that the game plans against both Florida and Auburn were more centered around the idea that the quarterback can’t beat you (and therefore there was more cause for concern with the opponent running the ball) rather than that the quarterback is the biggest threat on the field, which is the case with Alabama.
Had LSU not changed its defense in the second half,
Trask might have beaten them; but that doesn’t mean that if on average the
Alabama offense scores 50% more than the Florida offense against a given
opponent that we can expect 42 points here.
If LSU plays Alabama the way they played Florida in the second half, you
could only expect 21 for the game (Florida only scored 7 in the second half).
Maybe they’re just salty because their model doesn’t
account for changes in strategy or for the fact that your point total can be
cut in half (as LSU’s was by Auburn) if you all of a sudden play a much better
defense than you have been playing. Alabama’s
average right now is about 48.6. LSU’s average before Auburn was 50.3, so
Auburn actually held LSU to 45.7% of is average.
If LSU does the same to Alabama, that’s 22 points. I’m not saying that will happen or that 41 CAN’T happen. There is just no inherent justification for it. It’s not safe to assume the offense just keeps rolling as it has been minus 7-11 points. Look at last year. Same quarterback, but when Alabama played LSU they had a 54.1 average. That makes the 29 allowed by LSU look pretty good. (It helped that we couldn’t sustain drives, but that’s not our strong suit this year either.) So if LSU is able to take 25 off of the average again, I like those chances. Clemson took 38 off of the pre-LSU average. I’ll be shocked if LSU does that, but only mildly surprised if they do as well as last year’s defense. High 20s wouldn’t shock me any more than low 40s, and low 20s wouldn’t shock me any more than high 40s.
Alabama is not a particularly good team with the running backs this year, and CFN even said during their video that they expected LSU to have about 3/4 of a yard per carry more than Alabama. And that’s given that Alabama has a decent front 7 and given that LSU isn’t particularly good at running the ball this year.
Their response was to strawman me as saying “Alabama
could be terrible, they haven’t played anyone.”
I didn’t say they could be terrible, I just said they might not be as
great at passing as these guys said since they haven’t faced a good defense
this year. If Alabama is going to score
41 points while not being able to run very well, they have to have a good
passing game.
Anyway, the response to the strawman was that to
hear this every year is “getting weird”.
What does “every year” have to do with this
year? Alabama beat Clemson by 18 two
years ago (despite losing to them the previous year). Did that help last year when Clemson won by
28? Trevor Lawrence outplayed Tua, who
threw two interceptions (to zero), one fewer touchdown, and 2.1 fewer yards per
attempt in January. Does that mean
someone shouldn’t adjust their expectations if Alabama’s next game were against
Clemson instead of LSU? I guess you
can’t attack Clemson for their schedule anymore because they played two top-3
teams in January.
I attacked Finebaum for being half in this season and half in last season, but he saw the error of his ways. He actually agrees with me now on Ohio St. #1 and LSU #2. I changed by dropping Clemson since then, but at least I admitted I was giving Clemson the benefit of the doubt based on last year. But he’s not these guys who construct their model and their arguments around this season and then act like I’m crazy for ignoring last season. I don’t think he’d talk to me unless I called his show and got through, but that’s beside the point.
I finished my response to CFN by saying, “Florida is a pretty good defense [they held Auburn to 13, just FYI]. Tell me what game we can use to extrapolate that Bama would score 42 against Florida.” I honestly would have loved an answer (and if it were a good one, I’d admit that LSU doing better than Florida would defensively might even be charitable), but the lack of an answer and the preference to mock a straw man tells me a good bit too.
Here is the full transcript:
Me:
Either
team could win by multiple touchdowns depending on a key play here and there
and who’s under pressure to be one-dimensional and throw 50/50 balls.
But I
don’t think you can say Alabama has an elite passing attack based on their
opponents. You’d be calling Burrow the best QB in history with Alabama’s
schedule.
LSU has
forced every team to throw the ball either to stay within a score or come from
behind or both. In doing so, they often left a buffer behind the line of
scrimmage just to prevent big plays and buckle down near the end zone. That’s
how Florida was shut out for 25 minutes in a row. That’s how Miss. St. was shut
out for 34 minutes. That’s how Auburn only had one legitimate scoring drive in
a 50-minute period. That’s how Northwestern St. and Utah St. were completely
shut out in the second halves. So the 90+% average probably won’t apply unless
LSU has a good lead or is scoring so consistently Alabama is afraid to even try
running the ball AND LSU struggles to get to passes and make tackles.
The other
thing is part of the strategy against Florida (which didn’t work) and Auburn
(which worked a lot better) was to make the quarterback beat you by leading
long drives. They know Tua can do that. They know Bama isn’t as scary running
the ball (with a non-QB) as Auburn and Florida. So they’re not going to focus
on the run and be lax about the pass.
The
Alabama offense hasn’t had to adjust to a good defense. Maybe they’ll do so
flawlessly, but we don’t know. I trust LSU to do that more than Bama based on
what’s been shown this year. For instance, Texas wasn’t good, but you don’t
have to be good to stop a third and 19. They still couldn’t and it wasn’t their
fault. Florida is a pretty good defense. Tell me what game we can use to
extrapolate that Bama would score 42 against Florida.
CFN:
You think Auburn and Florida are better running
teams than Alabama? Florida is 90th in total rushing, 75th in YPC. Also this
“Alabama could be terrible, they haven’t played anyone” thing every
year is getting weird. Alabama has a #1 overall draft pick at QB and the best
WR unit in CFB history. Does that mean for certain they’ll break 40? No. But to
question their passing attack is bizarre.
Me:
College Football Nerds You had to respect Perine
being able to break a long run. Even if
Alabama has a player like that, he didn’t run for 88 yards in one play against
a good defense.
Pierce later ran 75 in one play against South
Carolina. That game could have been much
different if it were 20-10 Carolina at the half.
To act like they have a proven passing attack THIS
YEAR is bizarre
If Tua never started before this year he wouldn’t be
a #1. LSU had a #1 pick in 2006 and lost
to Auburn 7-3. That doesn’t prove
Alabama is going to produce like you’re saying against a good defense. This isn’t the NFL, there isn’t an NFL
offensive line. Not everything
translates from college to the NFL. Ask
Saban.
Something else bizarre about one year transferring
to another is how Alabama went from beating Clemson by 18 to losing by 28. Is
Trevor Lawrence the best QB in college football today? He was better than Tua in January
I think my one-paragraph prediction about this game (last paragraph here) was exactly right. There were some things that were somewhat surprising though.
I’ve updated the records here. I had forgotten that other than Alabama, the only two teams that have beaten Auburn a majority of the time (with at least 10 games played) are from Louisiana: LSU and Tulane.
I advised taking Auburn and the points. I said that I wouldn’t have been surprised if
Auburn scored about what Florida did and actually thought Auburn might have scored
more. What I didn’t expect was that 24
would have been enough to win. The
visiting Tigers were still most of the way to Florida’s point total of 28.
I said that Auburn would probably stop LSU from
scoring a couple of times more than Florida did. LSU had four scoring drives
rather than six, so that was correct. I
didn’t expect LSU would get to what would have been field-goal range last year
about six times with no points to show for it though.
That’s the second game in a row in which LSU struggled to score touchdowns after driving deep in the opponent’s territory, especially early. I don’t know if that’s a long-term issue or those were just two pretty good defenses with a relatively short field. I know Mississippi St. has given up a lot of points over the course of the year, but some of that was the fault of their anemic offense. The Bulldog defense at least seemed fresh with home crowd behind it for 25 minutes against LSU before the Tigers scored two touchdowns late in the first half last week.
I was surprised that LSU committed two turnovers,
one of which set up an Auburn touchdown.
There were also two officiating decisions that assisted in that score
(both the turnover and the touchdown itself), but I’ll talk about officiating
later. Anyway, that actually brings up
one unexpected positive for the Bayou Bengals.
I didn’t think Auburn would be incapable of a touchdown drive beyond 22
yards in the first 57 minutes of play.
The sacks and tackles for loss didn’t shock me. I knew
that was an area that Auburn was good at.
I still think LSU has a good offensive line, but it’s not going to stop
a really good front seven (possibly the best LSU will face) every time.
I did like how Burrow ran and threw across the
backfield to avert the pass rush. I knew
that would be necessary to avoid some of the rush. Having more quick,
short-yardage plays helped LSU win the time of possession. This was more of a traditional LSU win in
that way.
Another positive was the halftime adjustments. A good offensive coach like Dan Mullen or Gus
Malzahn can come up with a scoring drive to start the half, but Florida didn’t
score a second time in the whole half and Auburn didn’t score a second time until
about 24 minutes of play later.
Mississippi St.’s only score of the second half was in the closing
minute. Northwestern St. and Utah St.
were completely shut out in the respective second halves.
I hope that LSU is at least within a couple of scores of Alabama after the Tide’s opening drive of the second half. The Tigers could be ahead for all I know, but it really hurt their chances when Alabama scored a touchdown 75 seconds before the half last year to make it realistically a three-score game (two touchdowns and two two-point conversions isn’t necessarily realistic). Nine points instead of 16 would have mattered there. Nine points was the halftime deficit against Auburn two years ago, so I think that’s a good bare-minimum goal if we don’t have a good first half. I think the defense would give the offense a chance to catch up in the third and fourth quarters in that scenario.
Going back to the Auburn score to open the half, I
thought that even though Auburn scored, it was a moral victory of sorts for the
defense to come up with a stop inside the 10.
LSU has been good at that this season.
Auburn was good too, but hopefully Alabama isn’t as good at that if the
Tigers have such chances in Tuscaloosa. LSU responded by driving to the one-yard
line when they were stopped at fourth and goal, but the ball pretty much stayed
on the Auburn half of the field until LSU scored to take the lead for
good.
I’m not going to go into all the calls, but the
officiating was terrible, so I was glad LSU was able to withstand that.
The hit on Burrow looked bad. I thought helmet-to-helmet hits when a guy is
going out of bounds was against the rules.
The TV rules expert said Burrow wasn’t defenseless, but I’ve certainly
seen other players being tackled or going out of bounds ruled as defenseless. Those guys seem more like PR agents for the
refs than unbiased arbiters anyway.
There was also kind of a hip check by an LSU
defender that was called pass interference.
I didn’t think it denied the opportunity to catch the ball, and the
receiver wasn’t even looking for the ball.
Pass interference should only be called when it conceivably could have
been a catch without the interference, which was the case when there was a
non-call in the end zone at the end of the first half. I’m not saying everything they called or didn’t
call was in Auburn’s favor, but they definitely favored the visitors.
We had a couple of players, Tyrion Davis-Price and
Derrick Dillon, who reacted to what should have been penalties on other
players. That accounted for 30 of the
118 yards of penalties called on LSU. If
the ref doesn’t call something, a player doesn’t need to make it worse by
having them call a penalty on LSU. You also
can’t count on offsetting penalties even when they’re deserved (which was a big
part of the reason LSU lost to Alabama in 2014). The flags themselves were justified though.
Top-10 opponents
Anyway, LSU is now 8-2 against top-10 opponents over
the last three seasons. You can guess who the two exceptions were. Alabama is 6-2 (losses to Clemson and Auburn),
and Ohio St. is 6-1 (loss to Oklahoma). Those three teams happen to be in close to a
three-way tie atop the AP poll this week.
The Tide has not played a top-10 team this season, and LSU has played three top-10 teams. How is this possible when they’re in the same division of the same conference? Alabama has not played Auburn yet (obviously), their best out-of-conference opponent was Duke (LSU’s was Texas when the Longhorns were still undefeated), and their annual cross-divisional rival is Tennessee (LSU’s is Florida).
Before someone says I’m wrong about the top-10 opponents, I know there was an ESPN graphic posted after the Florida game about how Alabama and Ohio St. had more wins over top-10 teams; but that was going back to 2016, the year that Les Miles coached 4 games before giving way to Orgeron. LSU beat three ranked teams that year, but none were in the top 10. This gave the other programs a head start, and I don’t think it’s really fair to expect an interim coach to beat top-10 teams anyway.
Race for #1
Most teams have played 8 games. A couple have even played 9. I think we’ve progressed far enough into the
season to completely ignore last year from now on. That being the case, although Clemson is
still what I’d call a good undefeated team, I no longer consider them #1. LSU’s best two opponents (Auburn and Florida)
are better than Ohio St.’s best two opponents (Cincinnati and Wisconsin), but
the Buckeyes have had a better schedule week to week. Indiana rates higher than Texas (I don’t care
how they were ranked at the time of the game), Michigan St. rates higher than
Utah St., Florida Atlantic rates higher than Mississippi St., and Nebraska
rates higher than Georgia Southern. I
don’t think anyone lower is worth mentioning.
I don’t put much of a premium on margin of victory,
and it has nothing to do with why Ohio St. is #1 in my computer formula; but
the way the games have played out also indicates to me that there are fewer
teams that Ohio St. would struggle against than teams that LSU would struggle
against.
Ohio St. is the clear #1 in both the weighted and
unweighted versions of my formula as well.
For instance, in the unweighted system, only 0.007 separates Penn St.
from Clemson. In the weighted system,
0.24 separates the two. Ohio St’s
respective leads over LSU are 0.093 (over 13 times the difference between
Clemson and Penn St.) and 1.911 (about 8 times the difference between Clemson
and Penn St.).
My educated guess is that if LSU and Ohio St. both win in two weeks, LSU will finally have enough points to go ahead, but it matters how prior opponents of the respective teams do and how opponents of those teams do over the next two weeks as well. Also, there is more reason to be skeptical that LSU will beat Alabama than there is that Ohio St. will beat Maryland.
I mention two weeks instead of next week because #1
Ohio St., #2 LSU, #4 Penn St., #6 Alabama, and #7 Minnesota all have byes next
week. #3 Clemson plays Wofford, so I don’t
think there is any concern of a major change among the top teams next week. If #5
SMU beats Memphis, the Mustangs may move up a spot or two; but that will
probably be temporary given that SMU will not stand to gain many computer
points by being East Carolina on November 9.
Kansas and the Big XII
Baylor, an undefeated team I haven’t mentioned much
and possibly the last good hope for the Big XII (at least unless a series of
losses by others puts one-loss Oklahoma back in the top 4), starts a
challenging three-game stretch on November 9 as well. Unfortunately, they won’t be playing SMU
since the Southwest Conference disbanded in 1995; but they travel to Forth
Worth on that day before hosting Oklahoma and Texas in the subsequent two
weeks. November 23, which is the day
Baylor plays the last of those teams, is also a big day for currently-undefeated
teams since Ohio St. plays Penn St. on that day.
I don’t know whose idea it was for Baylor to travel
to Lawrence, Kansas, on Rivalry Week unless they thought it was basketball; but
Les Miles’ Jayhawks have been looking good the past couple of weeks under new
offensive coordinator Brent Dearmon. It might seem far-fetched for a team with only
3 wins right now to beat a team who’s currently undefeated, but something
similar happened during Rivalry Week in 2001.
Les Miles’ first Oklahoma St. team entered the game against #4 Oklahoma
with only 3 wins and yet beat the Sooners. Games like that can be tough when it’s
the closest thing the opponent will get to a bowl game.
KU would need some luck, but they certainly had that last night. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a team have the potential winning field goal blocked only to simply try again from a closer distance on the next play. Combined with the game in Austin I mentioned here, it was the second consecutive week that a field goal on the final play decided the winner in a Kansas game. Also, although Texas and Oklahoma may have seen better years, I don’t know how many teams can beat the two in consecutive weeks and still be ready to ward off a potential upset on the road. Maybe Baylor is just that special, but I have my doubts.
Top 25
NOTE: I only gave myself leeway of two spots from the computer ranking. This was only done for a handful of teams though.
As I’ve been doing with these series recaps, I’m
only going to focus on a portion of Auburn’s rivalry with LSU. The rivalry did pick up intensity in the
1990s as I’ll explain, but the really interesting time was 2000 to 2007.
My original entry in the Rivalry Series covers mostly the same games, but there are different emphases. Here I won’t talk as much about the records or rankings of teams going into the game, and I won’t refer back to the significance of each game within the greater rivalry.
Deciding the SEC West and Home Field Advantage
When LSU became relevant in SEC title races starting
around the time Saban showed up, the main obstacles every year were Florida and
Auburn. Except for Arkansas in 2002 and 2006 (the Hogs had the benefit of not
having an annual series with either Georgia or Florida), the winner of the
LSU-Auburn game would represent the SEC West in the title game every year from
2000 to 2007.
By the way, for some reason, the SEC calls you a winner of the division if you don’t play in the title game; but the way I look at it is if you lose the tiebreaker for first you’re second. You’re not still in the broken tie for first. So when I talk about winning the SEC West, I’m going to mean winning the tiebreaker as well.
LSU has still never won the SEC West in an even year largely because the Tigers play both Auburn and Florida on the road in even years (and historically LSU is less likely to beat Alabama at home than on the road anyway). You’ve probably seen it mentioned that LSU hasn’t lost to Auburn at home since 1999, but for a while that was mutual. Nick Saban went 0-3 at Auburn as LSU head coach, and Les Miles also lost his first game at Auburn. Miles would win two of the next three before losing his last two, the last of which lost him his job.
LSU would end that streak in 2008, but speaking of
Nick Saban, that was when Alabama became the team to beat in the division. LSU beat Alabama and Auburn to win the SEC
West in 2011, and Auburn beat LSU and Alabama to win the SEC West in 2010. The three teams went 1-1 against each other
in 2013; but LSU lost to two other teams (Georgia and Ole Miss), so that
allowed Auburn to win a two-team head-to-head tiebreaker. I think we all know who won the other 8 SEC
West titles since then.
In addition to being less important for the
division, those three games just didn’t have the drama to go into much
detail. The 2010 game was the relatively
close one, decided by only 7; but the LSU defense and offense both seemed
defeated once Auburn took the lead with a about 5 minutes to go. Auburn could
have scored again at the end of the game but ran out the clock instead. They took the last snap from the LSU 3.
The 2012 LSU win, which at the time was only the
second win at Auburn since 1998, was close; but Auburn turned out to be a
terrible team. Gene Chizik has not been
a head coach since that season and may never be one again. There were also only 6 points scored after the
first quarter – a field goal by Auburn in the second quarter and a field goal
by LSU in the third quarter. I like to watch good defenses more than most fans,
but there are only so many ways to describe not scoring points.
Other than it being an important game since one or
both teams has been a major force in the conference (if not nationally), it’s
also been a close game – again, not unlike LSU-Florida.
The Making of a Rivalry: 1993 to 1999
Unlike Florida though, it was typically a competitive
game even going back before 2000. It
wasn’t even an annual series until 1993. That first game wasn’t very close, as
Auburn went undefeated that season (but since they were on probation they weren’t
considered in the national-title hunt), but that changed in a hurry.
LSU led 23-9 in 1994 before Jamie Howard threw three pick-sixes and the Bayou Bengals lost 30-26. Auburn had a quarterback named Nix, but other than a field goal drive in the second quarter, he was unsuccessful. The four defensive scores were enough for the Plainsmen though.
In Death Valley the next year, the home team won by only
6 points. That would be LSU’s first
winning season in 7 years.
In 1996, LSU won on “the night the barn burned”. It wasn’t a barnburner as neither team was
able to get to 20 points. It was 17-15 with
38 seconds to go when the home-standing War Tigers decided to go for two. That backfired (no pun intended) as LSU
returned the botched conversion attempt for two points. The game was given the nickname because an
old gym caught on fire during the game.
The next year, an Auburn touchdown in the last
minute of the game would make the difference as LSU was only ahead by 4 before
the score.
Both programs went downhill the following two
seasons with the road team winning fairly easily both times. However, Auburn made a coaching change
between 1998 and 1999, while LSU waited until after the 1999 season. Auburn’s new coach Tommy Tuberville happened
to have been the coach of Ole Miss when they beat LSU in 1997, which in
retrospect would keep LSU from winning the SEC West for the first time.
After that 1999 win by Auburn, Tuberville smoked
cigars with his team on the field. He
rationalized it by saying it was only Auburn’s third win there since World War
II, but he didn’t mention that it was also Auburn’s third win at LSU in four
tries. Now he explains that it was also
his birthday, but you don’t have to linger in an opponent’s stadium to
celebrate your birthday. Even if he just
had shared a big cake on the field with his team, that would have been
weird.
2004 to 2007 Game Narratives
That wouldn’t be the end of the weirdness. It was a big game, but none of the games were
very interesting or exciting the next few years.
Then in 2004 it got interesting again. I know a lot of people blame Les Miles for
ushering in low-scoring games, but the offense wasn’t always exciting in Saban’s
last year either. LSU led 9-3 after 58
minutes of play. Auburn would score on third and 12 from the LSU 16, but the
extra point was blocked. Apparently a new rule had been implemented in the
offseason that if you land on another player after attempting to block or
successfully blocking a field goal, it was a personal foul. Auburn got to try
again and would win by that one point.
Since 2004 would become known as the extra point
game, it only followed that we needed a field goal game. This would happen 13 months later when the
two teams would miss a combined 7 field goals in 10 attempts.
LSU led 14-10 after Auburn made its one field goal in the second quarter and the teams exchanged touchdowns in the third. The Plains Tigers would score another touchdown with just under 5 minutes to go in the game. LSU would get its first field goal a few minutes later to tie the game at 17 and eventually send it to overtime. LSU would have the ball to begin the overtime and would settle for a field goal. The Bayou Tigers had gotten one first down to help out the kicker Chris Jackson. Auburn would go nowhere during their possession, and John Vaughn would miss from 39 to end the game, his fifth miss of the game.
2006 was another weird low-scoring game. Les Miles was the coach, but he had inherited
his offensive coordinator from Saban.
That was a guy you’ve probably never heard of named Jimbo Fisher. But somehow (with the help of the referees of
course), he only managed to guide the Tigers to 3 points for the whole
game. Auburn didn’t need any field goals
and won 7-3 despite LSU having gained about twice as many yards.
Nonetheless, Fisher would do an impressive enough
job with LSU quarterback JaMarcus Russell the rest of the season to be offered
a similar position with Florida St. but with more incentive and under an aging
head coach being gently nudged into retirement.
LSU’s offense seemed to work just fine without him
in 2007 (although you can’t really say the same for the 10 years
afterward). LSU-Auburn was another close
game though. Auburn led 17-13 going into
the fourth quarter. Matt Flynn led the home
team on an 8-play 85-yard drive to put LSU up 20-17. After a punt, the Fighting Tigers expanded
that lead to 23-17. Auburn responded
with a 9-play, 83-yard drive to go up 1 with 3:21 remaining.
Unlike the last time Auburn played in Tiger Stadium,
K Colt David was having a good day, having gone 3 for 3 on field goals. It seemed like that was what LSU was playing for.
There was a number of running plays (including
spontaneous runs by the QB) that took time off the clock as Flynn drove the
Tigers downfield. LSU also converted a
key third and 3 from the Auburn 41 to keep the drive going (on a Richard Murphy
run). Jacob Hester, the hero of the Florida game a couple of weeks before,
would come in with his own 10-yard run.
When LSU had a third and 7 from the 23 with just under 10 seconds left, Auburn probably expected another run to set up a field goal (LSU still had a timeout). Instead Flynn threw to the end zone just to the outside of Demetrius Byrd, who turned at just the right time to catch the ball (see here if the picture doesn’t do it justice).
Since the extra point was taken with 1 second left,
a lot of people thought the pass was an unacceptable risk. I never bought into that since Byrd began to
catch the ball with :04 showing on the clock.
It just didn’t really matter whether they stopped it at 4 seconds or 1
second at that point. If he had dropped
the ball or missed it completely, it probably would have been 3 seconds. Maybe if he had juggled it several times and
then dropped it, it would have run out the clock though.
2016
One second would make all the difference 9 years later, but I’d rather not rehash that game again. SBNation did a good job though. You can’t tell for sure that the center wasn’t beginning the snap in the picture though.
(I already said all I needed to say about the games from
2008 to 2015.)
2017
I mentioned in the Florida summary how LSU had two
ugly losses in the first five weeks of the season in 2017 but came back to beat
Florida by 1. The next week, it looked
like the Tigers were going to have three ugly losses in seven weeks when #10
Auburn went out to a 20-0 lead in Tiger Stadium.
See my 2017 blog about the game for details, but I’ll just set up how LSU reduced the lead to 9 before halftime.
The defense holding Auburn to a field goal (meaning
it was 20-0 and not 24-0) wouldn’t have meant anything if the LSU offense hadn’t
gotten into gear on the next drive. LSU wouldn’t even require a single pass to
be thrown. Six rushing plays got the Fighting
Tigers 90 yards and touchdown (70 of the yards by on a carry Russell Gage).
Auburn looked ready to bring the lead back up to 20
a couple of drives later, but once again the defense bent but didn’t
break. After a first and goal from the
10, Auburn was only at the 8 before settling for a field goal.
LSU took possession back with 2:16 left. Given the passing struggles, success didn’t
seem likely, but that didn’t stop Danny Etling.
On the drive, Etling completed 5 of 6 pass attempts for 67 yards and a
touchdown.
The comeback wasn’t complete yet, but a 9-point
deficit at halftime looks a lot better than a 20-point deficit early in the
second quarter.
2018
I didn’t even talk about the details of the last LSU-Auburn game last year, I just debunked some of the whining after the fact by Auburn fans.
LSU went out to an early 10-point lead midway
through the second quarter, but Auburn roared back to go up 21-10 with about 25
minutes to go in the game.
Like in the previous year, it just seemed like the
LSU defense drew a line in the sand at that point. Auburn went three and out on their next
drive, then after one first down Stidham threw an interception in LSU territory. The next drive, Auburn missed a 52-yard field
goal. The only reason they got that far
downfield was a targeting call, and Auburn would not get beyond their own 30
again.
LSU also had to score in the meantime of
course. After one three and out, LSU was
able to vary run and pass to get into first and goal at the Auburn 8 but had to
settle for a field goal.
The next drive was really quick, too quick to watch in real time. Here is the slow-motion replay.
But LSU couldn’t get the two-point conversion. As mentioned, Auburn could do nothing on
offense, so LSU had to win the game with a field goal.
LSU had a third and 11 right away, but that’s when
there was one of the major pass interference calls I talked about in the blog
above. After an incompletion on first down, Burrow ran a few yards on second
down to make it a more reasonable third and 7, which the Fighting Tigers just
barely converted.
Burrow also ran on the next second down (which was
also 2nd and 10), but he was tackled for a loss on third down. Again, LSU was just able to get past the
marker, this time to Stephen Sullivan. After yet another first-down
incompletion, another pass interference was called on third down. This put LSU into field goal position, and of
course Cole Tracy made it.
This Year
Until the game last week (when LSU settled for field
goals on the first three offensive possessions), I might have said how Auburn
shouldn’t expect to hold this offense out of the end zone for long stretches of
time. LSU would eventually score as many
points against Mississippi St. in the first half as they scored against Auburn
the whole game last year though, so I’m still expecting this year’s LSU team to
easily outscore last year’s in this game.
I watched parts of the Auburn games against Oregon
and Florida. Although, the LSU defense
hasn’t always been great (though it is underrated by people who look at scores
rather than watching games), I still think there will be stretches where Auburn
can’t score. Auburn scored only 3 points
in the first four drives and 6 in the first nine drives against the Ducks Against Florida, which let’s remember allowed
42 to LSU, Auburn couldn’t score for the last 40 minutes of the game.
I do think Auburn’s pass rush will cause some
incompletions and might get sacks (unlike Florida’s), but the defensive
backfield might be even less able to keep up with LSU wide receivers.
Auburn does have a good front, hence the concerns
about the pass rush, but pass rush and run defense aren’t the same thing. If Auburn sends too much pressure, that could
leave open lanes for Burrow or one of the backs. If Auburn is trying too hard to defend the
run, that often requires staying near the line of scrimmage rather than rushing
the backfield.
Auburn also has a good offensive line, so LSU could
have some of the same dilemmas. But I’m
more confident in Burrow making good decisions in a game like this than Auburn
fans should be in (the younger) Nix even if Nix ends up with more time. Whitlow ran for about 4.5 yards per carry against
both Oregon and Florida, but he won’t be playing. Kam Martin (who had a few good carries
against Florida but ran poorly against Oregon) ran well in his first full game
as Whitlow’s replacement, but I don’t know how comparable running against
Arkansas is to running against LSU.
I would lean toward taking the points. I know I guessed wrong about Florida, but Auburn
can probably score about what Florida did and maybe hold LSU out of the end
zone on one or two more drives. Maybe
LSU just doesn’t have that final score to go up double digits like they did
against Florida. I would give Auburn
about a 1 in 3 chance to win. I think
having a week off after Florida and not having to do anything fancy against Arkansas
could be a slight advantage. Florida did
beat Auburn, but I think it was harder for the Gators to get back up for the
LSU game than it will be for Auburn. Also,
despite the eventual loss by 14, Florida did still have a decent chance to win
late.
I think the way I organized the blogs last week worked well, so I’ll talk about LSU and a couple of other big games. I won’t thoroughly go through the top 25, but it’s listed below. Click here for the computer rating of all teams.
I’ve updated the LSU/Mississippi St. rivalry blog. I did think LSU would be slowed early, and that ultimately held the Tigers below 40 for the first time this season. It was pretty close to the reverse of the 37-7 Bulldog win in Starkville two years ago. If LSU doesn’t miss an extra point and allow a last-minute touchdown, it would have been the same final score.
If anyone asked, I’m sure Coach Orgeron would say it’s
not about him; but I’m sure he’s satisfied to finally get a win in Starkville. There
was a lot that went wrong in his tenure at Ole Miss, but his two games there were
the main reason he got fired. To get
blown out there his first game against the Bulldogs at LSU had to feel like a
bad case of déjà vu.
I’ve talked a bit about Auburn in previewing both Mississippi St. and Florida. I might or might not have more to say later, but LSU/Auburn is always a big game.
For now I’ll just talk briefly about the recent rivalry. This game is at Tiger Stadium, but we had a couple of ugly losses against them at their place before last year. I mentioned Coach O’s two losses in Starkville as it related to his firing back in 2007. Les Miles had a much more successful tenure overall, but two losses in two trips to Auburn immediately preceded his firing at LSU.
Auburn has some desire for payback too. Those two losses at Auburn at the end of the
Miles era are the only LSU losses in the series since Auburn’s 2010 national
championship. Auburn hasn’t won at LSU
in 20 years. LSU beat a few pretty
highly-regarded Auburn teams over the past few years, including the one that
was one stop/score away from a national championship in 2013 and the one who
went to the SEC Championship Game two years ago. Auburn didn’t end up having a great year last
year, but they were ranked #7 and expected to beat LSU by a couple of scores. The bayou Tigers won on walk-off field goal. The point being that Auburn would especially
enjoy getting LSU back with an upset in this one.
Speaking of Les and upsets, Kansas almost had a big upset in Austin on Saturday; but if they’d won it would have made LSU’s win there less impressive. Even if the Jayhawks don’t win another game this season, I think he’s had a positive influence there so far. I was reminded this weekend that Lou Holtz went winless his first year at South Carolina, but Holtz without question got that program headed in the right direction.
I checked the score late in the Wisconsin game, and
I thought they would run out the clock being that they were up 9 and had
generally had a dominant defense so far.
So I was a bit surprised when I found out what happened. That takes some of the luster off of the Ohio
St. game, but it doesn’t necessarily mean the Buckeyes have more chance to win
than they did a few days ago.
I followed the same basic guidelines as last week. I didn’t move anyone more than 3 spots from the computer ranking. The only difference is there were no exceptions this week. I anticipate this will be Clemson’s last week at #1, but maybe not if LSU and Ohio St. both lose next week. I think the computer results are starting to make more sense, so I might not move teams much if at all next week.
I have a few other notes about LSU, but I mostly covered the ones about Florida Sunday and the ones about Mississippi St. Wednesday. I know I’m publishing this late, but it’s a weekend night; and the kind of people who are awake and ready for football before games start can read it as well.
I heard one bit of trivia I wanted to share. LSU has kept official stats on this since 1978, but Florida is the only documented time I can find in which the Tigers have faced only four third downs in a game. I looked at relatively high-scoring LSU games going back to the early 1960s (the Tigers did score into the 60s at times in the 1960s and 1970s and even scored 77 against Rice in 1977) and couldn’t find anything close. There may have been a blowout of an in-state school 100 years ago or something, but it’s probably been several decades at least.
I liked when they asked Orgeron what he would have said if someone told him the offense would average 52.5 points at this point before the season. He leaned toward the microphone like he was telling a secret and grumbled, “I’ll take it.”
Anyway, you’d think people would be positive about Orgeron and his team after a big win over another well-respected program and head coach, but it seems like Troy all over again.
Defending Orgeron
Finebaum
Also related to LSU, Paul Finebaum will say whatever he needs to say to pretend the best team is Alabama for as long as he can. Nothing LSU does counts because supposedly he heard the same things about the LSU offense last year. I don’t know how he would have heard the team who scored 19 against Florida last year had just as good of an offense as the one who scored 42 against Florida this year; but he does talk to the most ignorant people in Alabama, so it’s possible.
What really annoys me is he said this a couple of weeks after saying he was dropping Clemson because the rankings are only for this season and you don’t factor in anything from last season. So Alabama goes ahead of Clemson because the 44-16 win in January doesn’t count, but Alabama also goes ahead of LSU because the 29-0 win last November does count.
John Hayes
Then I saw today someone named John Hayes trying to insult Orgeron (he said the tweet was a “backhanded compliment”, and he admitted he sees Orgeron as a lesser coach) by saying he’s not really the one on the field doing anything. I think he was trying to say Orgeron isn’t calling the plays, but so what? When Saban doesn’t call plays, he doesn’t get credit?
Hayes was interviewed by “Off the Bench”. I mentioned this tendency of his before, but yet again T-Bob got the stat wrong. He said Dabo Swinney had more wins over top-10 teams since Orgeron became head coach, but that’s not true. The only two better than Orgeron were actually Nick Saban and Urban Meyer.
Dabo Swinney and Nick Saban
Just to be clear, there isn’t anything a coach can do in three seasons (other than win three national championships right away) that really earn a comparison to where Swinney and Saban are right now, but we can look at how they got here and think about other coaches possibly following a similar path.
Dabo was actually part of Hayes’ argument since he has recent wins over Saban, but let’s not forget that Swinney didn’t just start at Clemson. He became the interim coach 11 years ago, not 3 like Orgeron. In 2011 (which is the season that corresponds to this one for Orgeron), Clemson went 10-4 and gave up 70 points in a bowl game. So should he have been written off as a mediocre coach then? By the way, Dabo was in the middle of five consecutive losses to South Carolina. It’s just a completely unfair comparison if you only look at where Swinney is now.
Even Saban lost to LSU in three of his first five tries and was lucky to win that many. LSU and South Carolina 10 years ago were nothing like Alabama (the two LSU teams Saban beat in that span lost a combined 9 games) now. Saban won a national title in his third full year, but people weren’t crowning him best coach ever in October 2009.
The main question is why Orgeron should be expected to reach Saban’s or Swinney’s peak faster than they did. But I think the fact that people like Feinbaum and Hayes see the need to point out the difference between Orgeron now and those guys at their peak (or is it a plateau?) means he’s one of the best coaches right now.
Hayes said he would be proven right if Alabama beats LSU easily this year, but I completely disagree. If Clemson lost to West Virginia by 37, they wouldn’t have been close to Alabama, which won the championship by 21, in 2011. I don’t know if there is a score Alabama could win by that would be the equivalent of losing to that West Virginia team by 37. 70 maybe?
Lincoln Riley
I don’t hear anyone pointing out how Lincoln Riley at Oklahoma, for instance, hasn’t won the games Swinney and Saban won the last few years to minimize a good win. He’s started out his career with a great record and is coming off a big rivalry win this week too. “Hold on, you can’t say he’s a great coach yet” is only necessary to these commentators because people are more tempted to say Orgeron is great.
I did listen to a follow-up interview Hayes did (I had to get a free trial, so sorry if it doesn’t work for you), and to my surprise he said Riley would be his #1 choice for head coach if he were an AD. I’m sorry, that’s silly. It’s just typical offense-obsessed media. Riley had three big games last season (his second full year) and lost two of them (the first game against Texas and the semifinal). He won three of the four big games (out-of-conference game against Ohio St., the two against Big XII #2 TCU, and the national semifinal) his first year, but he also lost to what turned out to be the 4th-best opponent Iowa St.
Like Joe Brady, he’s a good young offensive mind, but he’s not even in the top 10 on my list of best head coaches; and I don’t think we have a real sense of how he can recruit yet. There are probably a dozen coaches who could have won 24 games or more in 2017 and 2018 in Norman.
Kirby Smart
On the Off the Bench interview, there was an argument made about Kirby Smart, but Orgeron beat Smart easily in their only meeting last year. Smart did win the SEC and a semifinal game in 2017, but the Bulldogs lost one of only two regular-season games against the SEC West. Georgia did win the follow-up over Auburn; but LSU beat Auburn the first and only time. So Georgia winning the SEC and making that game against Oklahoma was more a result of playing in the East than of Georgia being in better shape than LSU (although as I mentioned in the previous blog LSU didn’t have a great start in Orgeron’s first full season).
What LSU fan would trade Orgeron for Smart right now? I think Georgia would take that trade in a heartbeat. If they’re going to lose to South Carolina in a home game with Fromm, who knows what could happen the first year without? The Bulldogs are far from guaranteed a win over Florida, which obviously LSU has now. Smart also had an offseason of recruiting and hiring that Orgeron didn’t have in 2016.
I think Smart is a good coach despite what happened Saturday. You could argue he’s better than Orgeron, but I don’t think there is a good argument that they’re not comparable.
Other Comments
As for the other games, there were a couple of embarrassingly bad calls by referees. Memphis completed a pass in Temple territory late in the fourth quarter, and somehow it was overturned despite no evidence of the ball hitting the ground. That easily could have prevented the winning field goal by the Tigers, but the ball went over on downs. There was a call that went against Penn St. at Iowa. Penn St. won, so it didn’t really affect the game, but it does cost the Nittany Lions 4 points. The pylon cam confirmed the call on the field, and yet it was overturned. Eventually Penn St. settled for a field goal on the drive. Replays of late seem to be just an extra avenue for home cooking.
I went into detail about the schedules of four of my
top five on Sunday (Ohio St./Wisconsin and LSU/Alabama could be matchups of
unbeatens), but Clemson will continue to play nobody. MAYBE 1-loss Wake Forest can give them a game
on the 16th, and traveling to Columbia, South Carolina, might be a
challenge after all; but I don’t think any potential winner of the Coastal will
be much of a test. Given the North
Carolina game, it’s hard to know for sure though.
If Wisconsin can’t do it, the next big test for the
Buckeyes is expected to be currently undefeated Penn St. on November 23. The Nittany Lions have a big game with
Michigan tomorrow though. Of course Ohio
St. will have to play them too. Penn St.
had a decent rise in the polls, but not as much as Oklahoma, who finally joined
the top 10 after beating Clemson. I know the Sooners hoped that Houston game
would mean something, but it really doesn’t.
Auburn being ahead of Florida might raise eyebrows, but
I don’t determine better resume by head-to-head. Both teams are 1-1 against the top 11. Texas A&M isn’t a great conference win,
but it’s better than Kentucky and Tennessee.
Auburn also beat Tulane. The
Green Wave looks better than the Hurricanes (Florida’s best non-conference
opponent) so far.
Florida does play Florida St. later, but so far the
only other non-conference games have been against FCS opponents. Florida will be fine if they win the next few
weeks (South Carolina and Georgia with a bye week in between) though. Unless Auburn beats LSU a week from tomorrow,
they don’t have a good chance for meaningful points for about the next month
(two byes, Arkansas, and Ole Miss). I’m
not projecting who will look better a month from now though, just looking at
who has done what so far.
Baylor’s undefeated resume got a little bit of
substance to it with the win over Texas Tech; but there was so little of
importance before that, the Bears are still only 13th. They almost have as good of a resume as fellow
undefeated and former SWC rival SMU.
Minnesota is an undefeated team that’s creeping up
even more slowly, but beating Rutgers won’t help much. Nor would beating Maryland the next week. The Gophers do have an intimidating November schedule
though: Penn St., @ Iowa, @ Northwestern, Wisconsin in consecutive weeks.
To round out the rankings, Washington returned by
beating Arizona, who had nearly made the top 25 the previous week. Wake Forest and Memphis are no longer
undefeated, but both held onto the top 25 after narrow losses. Navy was able to make it into the top 25
(despite having lost to Memphis a few weeks ago) after wins over Air Force and
Tulsa in the past two weeks. Hawaii also
stayed in the top 25 after a loss; but it was on the blue field, so the
Warriors weren’t hurt that much.
I do think Texas is still a top-25 team, but
respectable losses don’t get you far in my system. They need to find some decent wins. Oklahoma St., the Longhorns’ best win, is mediocre
unless the Cowboys beat Baylor tomorrow.
Texas plays Kansas, so the Horns won’t earn much there.
I put a couple of paragraphs at the end about what I expect of this game, but this is not a preview blog.
Coach O and Intro
You’ll see the relevance below, but I wanted to update Ed Orgeron’s record against the various SEC teams. Other than Saban, whose first year at Alabama was Orgeron’s last year at Ole Miss (Alabama won, 27-24), none of the coaches he has coached against as the Ole Miss head coach were SEC head coaches whom Orgeron has coached against at LSU. In fact, Les Miles is the only other active head coach in any conference whom Orgeron coached directly against at Ole Miss.
Winning records (not counting the 1-0 mark against
Missouri since they joined the SEC): Ole Miss 3-0, Texas A&M 2-1
1 game under .500: Auburn 2-3, Mississippi St. 2-3, Florida 2-3, Georgia 1-2, Missouri 1-2 (Missouri was not in the SEC when Orgeron coached against the Tigers at Ole Miss)
Worse: LSU 0-3, Alabama 0-6
Mississippi St., Florida, and Alabama are the only SEC programs against whom Orgeron has coached but against whom he does not have a winning record while the coach at LSU.
He didn’t coach against South Carolina at either stop and is still waiting to get revenge on Kentucky for beating his Rebels 31-14 in 2006. On the other hand, the first and one of only three conference wins at Ole Miss was against the Wildcats. The others were against Mississippi St. and Vanderbilt.
Anyway, this mostly isn’t about Coach O and his disappointments with the Rebels. It occurred to me that now was the perfect time to talk about LSU’s history against Dan Mullen, the current Florida and former Mississippi St. head coach. I’ll explain why, but given that LSU usually plays Florida in early October, it’s very rare that the Tigers play the Gators and Bulldogs back-to-back despite LSU having played both almost every year going back to the 1950s.
Dan Mullen vs. LSUand Rivalry Intro
Last week, Dan Mullen fell to 1-1 against LSU as head coach of the Gators, but he’s still 2-1 overall against Orgeron given his big win in 2017. LSU has a much more well-established historical series against the Mississippi St. Bulldogs, where Mullen coached from 2009 to 2017.
If you’re interested, here is the the full LSU/Mississippi St. Rivalry blog.
At State, Mullen didn’t have a good record against
LSU (2-7), but he had as many wins as Jackie Sherrill, the all-time State leader
in wins (75, which Mullen probably would have beaten by staying one more season)
and the only Mississippi St. coach to lead the Bulldogs to the SEC
Championship. Sherrill was there 13
years to Mullen’s 9, and this has been an annual series since 1944 (the
Bulldogs didn’t field a team in 1943).
The 2014 State win in Baton Rouge was the first
since 1991, Sherrill’s first season. The
2017 win (Mullen’s last year) was only the second win over LSU in Starkville
since 1984. The only other win was by
that Sherrill-coached team that made the SEC championship in 1999. It was by 1 point, and LSU would finish the
season 3-8.
One thing I regret about the changes in schedules is
that this was a traditional late-season game for both teams. Mississippi St. was usually warming up for
the Egg Bowl, and LSU usually played State between Alabama and Tulane. It was played on the second or third Saturday
of November (between 11/12 and 11/18) every year from 1947 to 1991. The first game between the two was actually played
on the third Saturday of November 1896.
It moved around the calendar before settling on a particular time
consistently, but it was generally in November from then until 1922 and then
every year from 1933 to 1940.
The game was played on the third Saturday of October from 1928 to 1932 and on five other occasions, so I guess there is at least some tradition to draw on this time. I don’t mind that this season we have a bit of a buffer between Florida and Auburn, although sometimes that is when a team gets tripped up, particularly on the road. Since Ole Miss can’t be Halloween weekend (which is a bye), I would have preferred Ole Miss serve as the buffer, but they didn’t ask me.
LSU vs. Mississippi St. 2009 to 2017
Mullen nearly scored an upset over the Tigers in Starkville in his first season in 2009. LSU won with a late goal-line stand by 4 points. I wonder if Mullen had flashbacks to that on Saturday. LSU didn’t ultimately have a great season at 9-4; but it was only two years after LSU won the BCS Championship, so it would have been a big deal.
That 2009 season was Mullen’s only season there that the Bulldogs did not qualify for a bowl game, so he probably would have been 9/9 had he figured out a way to gain that one more yard. The Bulldogs gained one yard on first and goal from the 2 and were stuffed on the next three plays. Only the third-down play was a pass. Chad Jones, who also won a national championship as a pitcher on the baseball team, made the two tackles at the line of scrimmage on second and fourth downs and defended the third-down pass.
In the next four years, no matter how good they were,
they couldn’t even make it interesting against the Tigers. It helped that LSU
went 44-9 over those 4 years.
The Tigers finally had a serious rebuilding job to do in 2014; and Mississippi St. had its best team in decades. The Tigers would play well at times that season (such as upsetting the #3 team and nearly upsetting the #4 team… more on that here), but that wasn’t until later in the year. What made it worse was the Tigers could not find a consistent quarterback that season, and the Bulldog quarterback was Louisiana native Dak Prescott, whom the Tigers coaching staff refused to offer a scholarship as a quarterback.
Prescott was not a household name before that
game. LSU was ranked #8 and the Bulldogs
were unranked. The depleted LSU defense
led by DC John Chavis was not prepared for that type of spread attack at all. The defenders were somehow unable to fill
gaps or keep the play in front of them, and they weren’t able to make key
tackles. Prescott threw for 268 yards
and rushed for 118 (not counting the sack yardage).
The only reason LSU was able to make the final score
respectable was that three different Tigers were able to throw for a combined 341
yards, but they didn’t even try to do that until they got well behind in the
game. QB Brandon Harris threw two
touchdown passes in less than 30 seconds late in the fourth quarter. The Tigers attempted an onsides kick with
1:27 left that would have given them a real chance to win, but when the
Bulldogs recovered it, they were able to run over a minute off of the
clock. LSU then had 20 seconds to go 80
yards, and you can guess how that went.
Harris did have 34 all-purpose yards on that drive before throwing an
interception on the final play, but it needed to be at least 34 yards in one
play.
It was 34-10 in the opening minutes of the fourth
quarter, so the 34-29 final score doesn’t convey how dominant the Bulldogs were
for most of the game.
The next year in Starkville it was the Tigers who
led early in the fourth quarter, 21-6 in that case. Kevin Steele, the new defensive coordinator
(now the defensive coordinator at Auburn), and Ed Orgeron, the Tigers’ new
defensive line coach, seemed to have instilled the right schemes and techniques
in the offseason. Cracks were already developing
late in the third quarter though. The
Bulldogs had just gotten into the red zone when the fourth quarter began and
shortly afterward Prescott took the ball into the end zone himself.
When LSU got the ball, the Tigers called three
rushing plays for a combined -1 yards.
Mississippi St. would drive again, but the drive stalled behind the LSU
30. Prescott was sacked by Lewis Neal on
third down to prevent a long field goal try (the kicker Devon Bell had
previously made it from 43 and it would have been about 49 before the sack).
The Tigers went back to their conservative ways on
offense again, but it actually worked for a couple of first downs before the
drive stalled at midfield, giving the ball back to Dak at the Mississippi St.
18 after a punt.
Prescott threw completions on 6 consecutive plays to
lead the Bulldogs to a touchdown, but he could not score from three yards out
on the conversion attempt, so LSU still led by 2, 21-19.
The Tigers still refused to throw the ball; and
Mississippi St. got the ball again, this time at the 11. Only 1:32 remained
though, so it wasn’t the dual-threat situation that the Bulldogs excelled
in. LSU jumped offsides on the first play,
and Prescott then threw completions in four of the next five plays. This gave the Bulldogs the ball at the LSU
39. The Tiger defense, knowing time was
running out, knew the Bulldogs were going to throw, probably toward the
sidelines. All three passes from that
spot were unsuccessful, leading to a fourth down with 3 seconds left. Fifty+ was probably not in Bell’s comfort
zone, and he missed from 52 as time expired.
The next year, Dak had been replaced by Nick
Fitzgerald (with assistance from Damian Williams… Mullen likes having a second
QB to throw into games apparently), and LSU had settled on Purdue transfer Danny
Etling as the starting quarterback in another early-season game. The Tigers
started strong again, this time with a 20-0 lead midway through the second
quarter. After and exchange of field
goals, it was 23-3 at the half. The
Bulldogs got another field goal in the third quarter, but it seemed like LSU
was going to run out the clock with no major drama.
However, the momentum shifted when LSU failed to convert a fourth down from the Mississippi St. 34. Rather than trying for a field goal to go back up by 20, LSU decided to go for the first down instead. Fournette was stuffed. He actually fumbled on the play, but by rule a fourth-down fumble recovered by the offense (which it was) essentially means the play was dead.
Fitzgerald and Williams responded with a 9-play,
66-yard touchdown drive to bring the score to 23-13. State recovered the ensuing onsides kick, and
Williams led the Bulldogs to another score, this time taking only two plays. It was now 23-20 with 3:30 to play. You can guess what LSU did (or didn’t do) on
offense, and the Bulldogs would start the next drive on their own 33 with 1:35 remaining.
The Bulldogs could only come up with a two-yard
rush, two incompletions, and a sack, so LSU would be able to run out the clock
after tense final minutes for the third consecutive game in the series. It was Les Miles’ 114th win as LSU
head coach and would be his last. It was
his 10th win against the Bulldogs in 12 seasons.
In 2017, both offenses were ineffective early (0-0
after the first quarter) and then more methodical (10-7 in favor of the home
Bulldogs with 5 minutes left in the half).
The wind was taken out of LSU’s sails when Mississippi St. had a
10-play, 54-yard touchdown drive to end the first half and a 7-play, 48-yard
drive that ended in a field goal to begin the second half.
Now down 20-7, LSU tried to mix run and pass on the
ensuing drive, but Etling went 1/3 for 6 yards on the drive. So Mississippi St. got the ball back. The shorthanded
LSU defense was already getting worn out, and then two players were ejected for
targeting. The Bulldogs were forced into
two third-and-1 situations, but they ran for a first down on one of them and fooled
the defense on the second one for a 45-yard touchdown pass. In hindsight, the game was essentially over
at that point even though 5 minutes remained in the third quarter.
The final score was Mississippi St. 37, LSU 7. The Tigers did have a couple of decent long
drives on offense, but when you’re three possessions or more behind, you
usually don’t try to settle for long field goals even if they were likely to go
in. The field-goal kicking that year was
not very reliable anyway.
The Tigers would lose to Troy two weeks later before
going 6-1 to close out the regular season.
I’d rather not talk about the bowl game.
At Mississippi St., Mullen only had double-digit wins that one year of 2014, but the 2017 team was tied for second-best of his tenure at 9-4. It was tied with the 2015 season in which they lost to LSU, 21-19.
Mullen goes to Florida
So 2017 was the first Orgeron-Mullen meeting. I still wish LSU had last year’s Florida game
back, but Orgeron has had a pretty decent improvement in two seasons,
especially considering that Mullen took over a better program. I look forward to more games between the two.
Mullen didn’t even replace a bad coach, just one who lost a few games in a row the year after winning the SEC East the prior year. As I mentioned last week, I’m not a Jim McElwain fan; but from what I saw he could at least do a respectable job of recruiting, hiring assistants, and managing the game (at least unless they got behind a few scores). The point of bringing him up is, although Mullen had to recover from a bad year and did well to win 10 games last season, I don’t think McElwain did anything that made it more difficult to win games at Florida than it had been at Mississippi St. in any long-term sense.
Not really apropos of anything, but McElwain is 4-3 as the Central Michigan head coach this season despite games against Wisconsin and U. of Miami. I was just curious where he ended up and didn’t find out until I looked him up while preparing the Florida preview, so I thought I’d share.
2019 Preview and Joe Moorhead
Anyway, since I’m done talking about Dan Mullen for now, I’ll mention the upcoming game against his successor Joe Moorhead, who actually served on the Penn St. staff with LSU passing game coordinator Joe Brady. Ed Orgeron said Moorhead called after the hire to add his endorsement.
I would say Moorhead had a respectable showing last season, going 8-5. He had close losses to Florida and Iowa (in the bowl game). He beat four teams who went to bowl games: UL-Lafayette, Auburn, Texas A&M, and Louisiana Tech. Apart from Iowa, all the losses were to teams who would win 10 games or more.
Things aren’t going quite as well this year. State started 3-1, which looked decent given the win over Kentucky (which had beaten the Bulldogs 28-7 last year); but the Bulldogs have been outscored 76-33 in the last two games. That included Moorhead’s first loss to a mediocre to bad team Tennessee.
Since Mississippi St. could only hold Tennessee to 20, I don’t think we will see a replay of last year’s 19-3 score in favor of LSU. The Bulldogs had three defensive players drafted from last year’s team, not to mention LSU’s changes on offense.
State has another decent mobile quarterback Garrett Shrader, but he won’t have the kind of talent around him that Nick Fitzgerald had in the big Bulldog win in September 2017 (and didn’t have last season). They have another quarterback Tommy Stevens who may come off the bench, but he’s statistically not as good at running or passing. Both have had injuries, which is the main reason LSU doesn’t want Burrow to show off his running abilities more.
Yet again I think the prior opponent most comparable to LSU is Auburn, who won 56-23. Shrader did average 5.6 yards per rush and 9.1 yards per pass in that game though. That was at Auburn and not following a top-10 opponent, so don’t be too disappointed if LSU doesn’t beat that margin of victory.
I will be very interested to see how the LSU defense deals with Shrader early though. Like Florida, the Bulldogs are capable of long, methodical drives; but unlike Florida they showed that ability against Auburn. They just couldn’t keep up with the Auburn offense, which had great field position on its first three drives to take a 21-0 lead. But if by contrast LSU struggles early offensively (which happened against Northwestern St. and Utah St.), maybe it will be a game for a while.
The SEC didn’t go exactly how I expected this week, but I do feel vindicated on a few counts. I will try to write about the other games and my rankings (below) later in the week.
South Carolina Upsets Georgia
I didn’t pick South Carolina to beat Georgia specifically, but when I picked South Carolina in my preseason top 25, I anticipated they would beat some good team during the course of the year. It could have been Florida, Clemson, Texas A&M (who, as I thought, isn’t as good as was projected anyway), I wasn’t sure. They still might beat one (or more) of those three, by the way. Also, I feel more justified in not giving the Bulldogs a higher rank going into the week.
LSU Somehow Beats the Spread
First of all, I’ve updated the LSU/Florida history blog. Most importantly, the series is tied in Baton Rouge. LSU has not had the lead in its home stadium in the series as long as I remember. I may write something about the LSU/Dan Mullen series later in the week.
I didn’t pick LSU to beat the spread, but I said if they did it would be the result of a late score. It was. Florida was within a couple of yards of scoring a late touchdown in response. It was for the most-part a one-score game. I was right that Florida couldn’t do a 4-man rush and drop 7 effectively. Burrow completed 15 of his first 16 passes (eventually going 21/24 for 293 yards), and even when Florida got good pressure he was able to at least get a couple of positive yards on the ground. Florida ended up with 18 more passing yards; but it took 20 more attempts, and it would be almost dead even if sack yards went against passing yards in college.
I was also right in the number of points Florida would score, 28. Arguably both offenses should have had more though (and I also underestimated LSU’s points), so maybe I did give too much credit to the defenses.
LSU DC Dave Aranda apparently thought the same way I and some of the prognosticators did: if LSU could keep Florida from scoring quickly the Gators wouldn’t be able to sustain drives. That was incorrect, but I (and I imagine Aranda) correctly anticipated LSU’s ability to avoid those long plays whether they pressured or not. I could be giving him too much credit, but I suspect Dan Mullen intentionally had a very different game plan against Auburn even though I don’t think the defenses are drastically different. I also think, like LSU, they’re good at diagnosing problems and correcting them. Florida and LSU both have good arguments for second-best coaching in the conference right now. As Matt Baker of the Tampa Bay Times said, not bad for a couple of backup plans.
I also thought in general LSU would do better in pass coverage especially early. The Tigers gave up yards after the opening drive in the second half, but they were just better when it counted during the 21-0 LSU run to end the game.
The turning point in LSU/Florida games is often how a team responds to a lead or to giving up a lead. In the last three games of the series, the winning team had a narrow lead (< 3 points) late; and the defense just barely held on. When LSU went down by 7 in this one (after Florida received the second half kickoff), it was the (momentarily) trailing team that seemed invigorated. The Tigers gave up a ton of yards after that but no points.
The offense let its foot off the gas a little bit at times (a couple of first-down runs where a pass might have been a better option, a couple of snaps late into the play clock) in the second half; but LSU scored 21 in both halves, so it didn’t hurt scoring. Being more methodical, which LSU rightly emphasized against Utah St., may have allowed the defense to have just enough of a reserve to close the deal in those fourth-quarter drives.
LSU did better penetrating into the backfield in the second half. It was also partly the defensive backs making interceptions (one of which was wrongly called back) instead of tipping the ball and Florida completing it. There was also a crucial (incorrect) interference call against the Tigers that helped Florida to score at the end of the first half. Late in the second half there was some good coverage by the Tigers that did not result in flags though.
If the linebackers or even blitzing backs left someone open during some of those plays where LSU sent pressure, the Florida quarterbacks didn’t have time to get it to them. The only blitz I noticed that really backfired in the second half was a screen pass on third and 16 during Florida’s last drive. I think the better strategy would have been to force the quarterback to throw short or try to scramble. LSU got only two sacks, but there were a lot more hurries and there were five tackles for a loss as well as several for very short gains.
LSU definitely needs better defense on third and medium-to-long overall though. I got so frustrated at one point I turned on Iowa/Penn St. to see some defense when the Gators had the ball. When you’re a couple of yards away though, they make it very difficult to score a touchdown. It reminded me of the two goal-line stands against Texas that I think ultimately won the game. There was a similar defensive showing against Utah St. after a turnover at the 7. Even on the third and goal from the two that the Gators scored on (the only score of the second half), it was lucky for the Gators the ball wasn’t intercepted.
One area that pleasantly surprised me was running the ball. I knew we had better backs than people said, but I didn’t expect over 200 yards against a good defense. I don’t think many predicted LSU would have 70 more rushing yards (on 16 fewer carries) than Florida and fewer passing yards. LSU had the same exact number of throwing plays as running plays.
I hesitated to predict that this would be the highest-scoring LSU/Florida game ever, and it just barely fell short. If LSU had hit the field goal in the first quarter or if Florida had scored when they were a few yards away either time in the fourth quarter, this game would have set the record. The 51-21 2008 runaway (also known as running up the score) with Tebow in Gainesville is still in first.
In 1996, Florida won 56-13 on the way to an earlier national championship (Spurrier also tried to score 50 every game regardless of the other team), so this game beat that one by one point. LSU doesn’t have that kind of margin of victory of course, but maybe winning a high-scoring game like this is a good omen. This is the highest-scoring game that LSU won. The Tigers had won 35-28 in 2015. LSU did score more (48) in a victory in 1971, but the Tigers held a winless Florida team to only 7.
Since Ed Orgeron took over at LSU, the Tigers have seven wins over the AP top 10. Only Nick Saban and Urban Meyer (with nine apiece) have more over that time span. Clemson’s Dabo Swinner has six.
Who’s #1 (and Who’s Going To Be #1)?
I still want to see what happens with Ohio St. and Wisconsin before I make either team #1. There is a very good chance the winner will be #1 regardless, but I don’t want to promise that. Sometimes there can be a combination of good results by prior opponents of one team and bad results by prior opponents of another team, and it yields unexpected results.
I’m only moving Clemson two extra spots to accomplish this, so it’s not anything crazy. The orange-and-purple Tigers are third in the weighted system behind LSU and Oklahoma, so at least they’re ahead of Ohio St. by some objective measure to introduce ambiguity.
On November 2, Ohio St., Wisconsin, Alabama, and LSU
have byes and Clemson plays Wofford. So
given that, I think it’s appropriate that after the games of October 26, I go
with the computer unless there is something really close or what I consider a
scheduling quirk.
This is what I consider a scheduling quirk. Let’s say I make Ohio St. #1, and after Ohio St. beats Rutgers on 11/16, they fall only slightly behind Clemson. I would keep Ohio St. #1 because they would have Penn St. next and Clemson would have a bye. I don’t like switching up #1 in my personal list without a loss (the computer formula does what it does and I don’t interfere). I will at some point, but I don’t consider a team with a good schedule no longer number one because they play a couple of weak teams in a row before they play two pretty good teams in a row (in Ohio St.’s case, Penn St. and Michigan).
If it turns out Ohio St. is the best team, what would be optimal from my perspective is Clemson stays #1 until Ohio St. takes over, and then there are no further changes. Alabama has a terrible schedule the next two weeks (Tennessee and Arkansas), so even if they beat LSU on November 9, it might not be enough. I don’t want to give Clemson a boost for that long anyway.
It’s fairly likely that whoever is #1 October 27 will stay that way on November 3. The only big game in the interim is Florida/Georgia (which is obviously less big on the national stage since both have a loss now), and I hopefully won’t have to agonize over anything.
If LSU goes undefeated through November 9, maybe the Tigers would have a chance at that point. Then the next week, Oklahoma might have a chance if Baylor keeps winning until they meet the Sooners.
Anyway, I don’t like to do a back-and-forth horse race at #1 for the reasons explained, but I almost never make any changes to the rest of the rankings after October for my personal rankings. I put what I think is most important into my system, and once we’ve played 2/3 of the season or more, I let that guide me. The reason I made a computer system in the first place is it’s too hard to look at 30+ schedules late in the season and consistently give pluses and minuses for every win and loss. It’s easier to do for 2 or 3 teams who have arguments for #1.
How the Sausage is Made
I’m not going to say anything else about the results last week or upcoming games until later this week, but I do have a bit to say about my rankings today and going forward. I think some people call this “inside baseball,” so feel free to skip to the rankings below if you don’t want the gory details (or click here if you only want the purely objective ratings).
Seven weeks into the season, I think we can start giving extra credit for quality opponents. If you played someone above zero, which is a team in the top 68 right now that’s the first bonus tier. The next one is 0.15, which is the top 39 right now. The highest tier is 0.3, which is the highest 19 teams right now. There are a couple of higher tiers, but those only come into play later in the season. Those decimal numbers are from the “traditional” unweighted system. So the unweighted system is the base, and the bonus tiers go on top of that to create the weighted system. So if you beat someone who’s 15th in the weighted system, it’s possible that they’re not in the top 19 in the unweighted system.
I think the best result is to average the weighted and unweighted systems. This is a little tricky because the numbers are so different, but the range from #1 to #130 in the unweighted system is almost exactly 1/50 the range in the weighted system. So I zero out the worst teams and then I average weighted score with unweighted score times 50.
I’m still giving myself leeway to move the teams three spots this week. The only exceptions are the top spot, which I treat a little differently, and Notre Dame, whom I wanted to move behind Georgia (Georgia is only two spots higher than the computer rank). Georgia lost to one USC and Notre Dame beat the other, but they both looked bad. So I thought the Bulldogs should remain ahead of the Irish team they beat.
It was below the radar for most, but I think it’s worth mentioning a couple of developments from the Utah St. game that may feed into the Florida game and have affected the emphasis in practice.
I was pleased with some aspects of the LSU game. The passing game didn’t look as great as it had previously, but the defense and running game looked a lot better. We were able to control the clock more, which I think made the defense more comfortable despite the heat. We had 3 running backs with at least 8 carries, and the worst one averaged 4.8 yards per carry. Burrow was almost as good with 4.2 yards per carry, and in college that number includes sacks. He had about 6.5 yards per carry without those.
Utah St. couldn’t run at all. The Aggies had 1 yard rushing in the first half and 18 in the second. I think this showed that the tackling drills during the week that Orgeron talked about paid off. Hopefully the practice drills to correct fumbles will bear similar fruit.
I really don’t like that Burrow threw another interception deep in the LSU end of the field (although it arguably should have been caught by LSU); but like when that happened inside the 10 against Texas, the defense kept the other team from scoring a touchdown. The defense only gave up one other scoring drive, and that one required a 35-yard pass (with a one-handed reception) and a 47-yard field goal. There was a similar long pass on the next drive for Utah St., but the LSU defense came up with a turnover before any more damage could be done.
There were a couple of penalties that shouldn’t have happened. There were actually three fumbles, although LSU recovered two of them. Utah St. is not a bad team, but if we have two turnovers against them, that gives me some concerns for some of the better SEC teams coming up. I also mentioned sacks, so it wasn’t the best pass blocking.
Florida Preview
I won’t go into elaborate detail about players to
watch for etc.; but I have consumed some media discussing the game, so I’ll
give my take.
I wasn’t that impressed with the model used by College Football Nerds and resulting predictions, but they did an all right job talking about the various units. I think Florida’s main problem, other than Tiger Stadium at night, is the fact that they’re coming off a tough game against Auburn. It’s just hard to improve along with the competition two weeks in a row.
If you didn’t see the game, Florida had a little bit of luck at key moments too. Auburn was poised to take the lead and threw an interception in the end zone after an 80-yard drive to end the third quarter. Auburn was driving again to at least get within 1 with a field goal, and Nix was dropped for a 22-yard sack (which he made much worse than it could have been). Then the first play after the punt the Florida running back Perine was able to get to the outside and no one was home, so he scored 88 yards later. I’m not minimizing the Gators’ skills, but it’s a little misleading that they finished with almost twice as many points as Auburn.
There were four turnovers by each team in the
Florida-Auburn game, and I think winning the turnover battle is definitely a
possible avenue to victory for the Gators. LSU can force turnovers; but defenders have to
have good hands and be ready to fall on fumbles. On the other hand, Tiger turnovers deep in
LSU territory (which have happened at least four times) that didn’t really
affect the outcome in previous games could make the difference here.
Auburn has a good defense that Florida got through for a few long plays (no Florida touchdown drive was more than 2 plays), although the Gators are not the best at sustaining drives. So basically I’m really confident if the LSU offense doesn’t make huge mistakes and the defense keeps the play in front of them and forces mistakes. Those are big ifs though.
I’ll elaborate more below and I’ve covered this in previous discussions of the rivalry history, but I’m really skeptical of LSU winning this game by multiple touchdowns (they’re favored by 13 1/2 last I saw). If they do, I think it will still be late plays that allow that to happen.
Since the Miles-Meyer era began, 2011 LSU (the one that lost the national championship to Alabama) and 2008 Florida (which won the national championship) were the only two teams to win by 14 more.. All were against opponents who lost at least 5 games on the year. The only other Florida wins by more than one possession (2006 and 2009) were by eventual 13-1 teams. The 2006 LSU team only lost two games, but the 2009 edition lost four. LSU won by 11 in 2013, but Florida would lose eight games to LSU’s three.
So if LSU is a Playoff team, I can see them winning by 10 or 13; but any more than that would probably mean Florida isn’t nearly as good as their rank.
Also, as sort of a transition, I wanted to mention that there is a good chance the game could come close to a high score in the series. Here are the games with the most combined points. It also shows how consistent the time of year in which the game is played has been.
Date
Location
LSU
Florida
Total
10/11/2008
Florida
21
51
72
10/12/1996
Florida
13
56
69
10/17/2015
LSU
35
28
63
10/9/2010
Florida
33
29
62
10/9/1993
LSU
3
58
61
10/8/1994
Florida
18
42
60
10/6/2001
LSU
15
44
59
10/11/2014
Florida
30
27
57
10/7/1978
Florida
34
21
55
10/9/1971
LSU
48
7
55
LSU/FLORIDA SERIES
See my series blog for the full details, but LSU/Florida has been a weird series. Prior to the addition of Arkansas and South Carolina in time for the 1992 season, LSU was the farthest West SEC school, and Florida was the farthest East. On the other hand, they are the two southernmost SEC schools and almost as far south as one another (Gainesville is slightly south being that it’s below the panhandle, and Baton Rouge is basically a straight line from the panhandle).
The third game in the series wasn’t played until
1953, but LSU has played Florida nearly every year since then (apart from a three-season
gap between 1968 and 1970).
I’m glad the game against Florida is at night. I think that’s as important as location if
not moreso. LSU is 6-2 in night games
against the Gators this century compared to 5-4 at home (the Tigers have the
same mark in Gainesville since 2001).
I’m not sure it mattered where or when the games in
2008 and 2009 were played. LSU was in a
rebuilding cycle those two years (The Tigers lost 9 games between the 2007 BCS
championship and the 24-2 stretch that encompassed the 2010 and 2011 calendar
years) while Florida experienced a 22-game winning streak that included both
LSU games. Tebow’s last game against LSU
was in 2009, which corresponded with the Tigers doing a bit better, so that’s
why I included the record since 2010 at the bottom.
Florida’s only win at Tiger Stadium since that 2009
game was a noon kickoff in a rescheduled game in 2016. Florida’s late goal-line stand in that game
nearly cost Ed Orgeron the permanent job as head coach.
LSU’s one-point win at Florida in 2017 (by the same
score the Tigers would have won by in 2016) got the ball rolling for Jim
McElwain’s departure. This development was
also enjoyable for LSU fans given his reaction to the win. The Tigers entered with two losses to
unranked teams. Florida had a loss, but
it was to a fairly decent Michigan team to open the season (at least the
Wolverines were fairly decent in their 8-2 start), so that loss stung. The Gators would have another close home loss
the next week before getting blown out by Georgia in Jacksonville, in what
turned out to be McElwain’s last game.
Chart of recent games
2005 was the first Les Miles vs. Urban Meyer game, so I thought that was a good place for the chart to begin although ig doesn’t encompass all the night wins. The coaches won three games apiece against one another, but the LSU wins were close (all by exactly four points) and dramatic.
There was also a close (night) game in Gainesville in 2004 that LSU won after benching JaMarcus Russell; but LSU suffered two losses in the previous three games that season, and Florida would lose five games overall. Both teams played like it (when the winning team throws three interceptions and misses two field goals it usually isn’t a well-played game), so it just didn’t have the same feel as the next few years, so I didn’t include it. LSU’s win in 2002, the Tigers’ first in Gainesville since 1986, was also at night; but it was a blowout.
Year
location
kickoff
result
2018
Florida
3:30
Florida 27, LSU 19
2017
Florida
3:30
LSU 17, Florida 16
2016
LSU
12:00
Florida 16, LSU 10
2015
LSU
6:00
LSU 35, Florida 28
2014
Florida
7:30
LSU 30, Florida 27
2013
LSU
2:30
LSU 17, Florida 6
2012
Florida
3:30
Florida 14, LSU 6
2011
LSU
2:30
LSU 41, Florida 11
2010
Florida
7:30
LSU 33, Florida 29
2009
LSU
7:00
Florida 13, LSU 3
2008
Florida
8:00
Florida 51, LSU 21
2007
LSU
7:30
LSU 28, Florida 24
2006
Florida
3:30
Florida 23, LSU 10
2005
LSU
2:30
LSU 21, Florida 17
In 2005, LSU scored the go-ahead touchdown with 12 minutes left and held the Gators to 17 total yards over the next four drives to hold onto the win. In 2007, LSU went 5 for 5 on fourth downs (one of them a fake field goal) and also added 8 third-down conversions to dominate time of possession. The Tigers scored the winning touchdown with 1:09 left after a drive of over 8 minutes. In 2010, in his last game against LSU, Meyer nearly had a meltdown after an over-the-shoulder pitch to the kicker on a fake field goal was ruled a lateral rather than an incomplete pass. The Tigers scored the winning touchdown in that one with only 6 seconds left.
The Florida wins in the Miles-Meyer era were relatively comfortable. Meyer’s three wins were the only Florida wins by more than one possession since 2003. LSU has only beaten Florida by more than one possession once since 2002.
Additional Background
This isn’t really key information, but I think it helps explain why this series is probably second to Alabama when it comes to motivating the LSU fans and also a little bit more about why I’m doubtful LSU will win big.
I’ll finish with years before the Miles-Meyer era and then fill in the gap between that era and 2016.
Going into the 2002 game, Florida had beaten LSU easily four games in a row and 8 games of 9. LSU only had two close games against Spurrier-coached Florida teams, both 28-21 final scores. The Tigers lost in Gainesville in 1992 and won in Baton Rouge in 1997. In the 2002 game, the first season without Spurrier, LSU won 36-7, its first win in Gainesville since 1986 and its first win over Florida by more than 11 since 1980. LSU has won by more than 11 only once since then, in 2011. Florida would 5 games in 2002 and 6 in 2011, so that’s why I’m skeptical of a big LSU win in this one. I’ve been wrong about LSU lines before, but I would lean toward taking Florida and the points.
The 1997 LSU win (the Gators’ first loss since winning the national championship in the previous season) was the Tigers’ only over the Gators from 1988 to 2001 Spurrier was hired before the 1990 season and left after the 2001 season. That was when LSU’s fortunes in the series began to change, not when Nick Saban arrived.
Saban went only 2-3 against the Gators as LSU head coach and also went 2-3 against Spurrier for his career (0-2 at LSU, 1-0 at Michigan St., and 1-1 at Alabama; of course the Alabama games were against South Carolina, not Florida). 2001 to 2004 was also a weird stretch because road teams won every game, none of the games were between top-15 teams, and the game was decided by one possession only once.
Anyway, I mentioned that in 2011 (the first game after Meyer left) LSU won easily. Florida won a close defensive struggle in 2012 when somehow former LSU coordinator Will Muschamp would lead the Gators to the Sugar Bowl. LSU would win the next three games before Les Miles was fired. The 2014 game was a rollercoaster; but it turned out to be two mediocre teams, so I won’t go into detail again.
I didn’t get around to posting a mid-week blog last week, but I may have a couple of them this week. I forgot to link them last week, but I’ve published my computer ratings for the second time this season. Maybe it’s good that I didn’t link them, because I had made a couple of mistakes that I’ve since caught.
It wasn’t the most eventful week. Thirty-four teams had the week off. There were a couple of losses by mid-range top-25 teams, but they were conference road games. None were particularly shocking. There was also the Auburn-Florida game. Most people I saw picked Auburn, but I don’t think anyone was too shocked Florida won.
In the late game, Stanford beat Washington. I found out that Stanford’s kicker is named Jet Toner, which sounds like printer ink. Anyone can beat anyone in the Pac-12 it seems, but Oregon is still probably the best bet to compete for a playoff spot since the Ducks have no conference losses. The Rose Bowl is not a semifinal this year, so the Pac-12 champion is guaranteed at least that.
Anyway, the main tricky team I got in the computer was Auburn, and that was largely because the Florida loss barely damages the Tigers right now. As an opponent, Florida is overrated in my system at the moment because their two games against FCS opponents don’t damage the strength of schedule. As a team, they don’t get much credit for those two games though. That’s why the computer doesn’t put the Gators ahead of Auburn even though they’re one of the “best losses” possible. It will be fairer if Florida loses because then the Gators will be harmed in winning percentage (4-1 is a lower percentage than 6-1, but 5-0 isn’t a lower percentage than 7-0).
I tinkered with a few different ideas of addressing
this before deciding that I would just move Auburn down the normal variation I
allowed myself for this week, which is four spots. There were more undefeated teams I wanted to
put ahead of Auburn, but I don’t think numbers 7 to 10 would beat Auburn
anyway.
Clemson is still in the top 3 in the computer formula with three wins against the top 60, so I still don’t think it makes sense to make a change. Ohio St. has more impressive wins so far, but there isn’t the kind of signature win that justifies becoming #1 in my mind. Maybe Wisconsin in a couple of weeks will do it, depending on how the SEC sorts itself out by then.
Although I tried to stay within the four spots, I did make a few exceptions based on losses (or lack thereof).
I liked that there was a group of undefeated teams
followed by a group of one-loss teams (with Oklahoma thrown in… see below), so
I didn’t think it made sense to put Oregon ahead of more undefeated teams,
especially now that the team they lost to has a loss itself. So I moved the Ducks
one extra spot down.
I moved Oklahoma one extra spot up because I think
the Sooners should be ahead of Texas since they’re undefeated. If the Longhorns are better, they don’t have
to wait long to prove it on the field. Switching them before the game doesn’t
accomplish anything.
Third, I excluded Washington from the top 25 despite a computer rank of 20th. If you’ve lost 40% of the FBS games you’ve played (to teams with 3 losses combined), that’s not top-25-worthy even with a good schedule. Again, it’s a problem that can be easily rectified on Saturday. If they beat Arizona (#27 in the computer formula), they’ll be in. If not, they won’t be.
Michigan St. did take the last spot despite two losses, but I think 4-2 vs. FBS (which is what Washington would be with a win on Saturday) is easier to justify than 3-2 with an FCS win. Also, one of the Spartans’ losses is to the computer #1. The Huskies’ better loss is to #31.
As for undefeated teams, Memphis, Baylor, and Minnesota all joined the top 25 by virtue of being undefeated. All the teams who fell out of the top 25 lost on Saturday. Colorado fell the most spots, but that was partly due to Air Force’s loss to Navy. Michigan and Cincinnati moved back into the top 25 despite earlier losses. Ohio St. and Wisconsin are two of the top four teams in the computer formula though, so I didn’t see those respective losses as a reason to keep the Wolverines or Bearcats out. Both had decent wins over the weekend. Michigan beat Iowa; and Cincinnati beat Central Florida.
A few teams have been seesawing, such as LSU (from 4th
to 14th and back up to 3rd) and Notre Dame (from 25th
to 7th and back down to 16th), but that’s part of the
volatility that takes place in the first weeks of the transition to the
computer system. It’s also partly
mistakes on my part in anticipating what the computer formula will do.
LSU gained from beating Utah St., which isn’t a bad team; but Georgia Southern finally won a game, so that gives the Tigers more credit for that win (so it was like two wins in one week). The Tigers also benefited from the rule changes I made to my top 25. Georgia and Alabama were too far back in the computer formula, and Auburn lost, so that accounts for all three spots that I moved the Tigers from the computer formula. This had minimal affect on the ranking, but I also feel like LSU addressed some of its issues in the way it played against Utah St. I’m less impressed by some of the other undefeateds. I’ll write more about LSU later in the week.
We will know more about a lot of teams this weekend, not just LSU. Hopefully that will clarify things and help limit the erratic movements from week to week.
Alabama, Auburn, Baylor, Clemson, College Football, Kansas, Les Miles, LSU, Memphis, Minnesota, Ohio St., Oklahoma, Oklahoma St., Penn St., SEC, SMU, TCU, Texas, Texas Tech, top 25, Wisconsin
Week 9 Top 25; Key Games and Race for #1
In College Football, General LSU, History, Post-game, Preview, Rankings, Rankings Commentary on October 27, 2019 at 2:02 PMLSU/Auburn
I think my one-paragraph prediction about this game (last paragraph here) was exactly right. There were some things that were somewhat surprising though.
I’ve updated the records here. I had forgotten that other than Alabama, the only two teams that have beaten Auburn a majority of the time (with at least 10 games played) are from Louisiana: LSU and Tulane.
I advised taking Auburn and the points. I said that I wouldn’t have been surprised if Auburn scored about what Florida did and actually thought Auburn might have scored more. What I didn’t expect was that 24 would have been enough to win. The visiting Tigers were still most of the way to Florida’s point total of 28.
I said that Auburn would probably stop LSU from scoring a couple of times more than Florida did. LSU had four scoring drives rather than six, so that was correct. I didn’t expect LSU would get to what would have been field-goal range last year about six times with no points to show for it though.
That’s the second game in a row in which LSU struggled to score touchdowns after driving deep in the opponent’s territory, especially early. I don’t know if that’s a long-term issue or those were just two pretty good defenses with a relatively short field. I know Mississippi St. has given up a lot of points over the course of the year, but some of that was the fault of their anemic offense. The Bulldog defense at least seemed fresh with home crowd behind it for 25 minutes against LSU before the Tigers scored two touchdowns late in the first half last week.
I was surprised that LSU committed two turnovers, one of which set up an Auburn touchdown. There were also two officiating decisions that assisted in that score (both the turnover and the touchdown itself), but I’ll talk about officiating later. Anyway, that actually brings up one unexpected positive for the Bayou Bengals. I didn’t think Auburn would be incapable of a touchdown drive beyond 22 yards in the first 57 minutes of play.
The sacks and tackles for loss didn’t shock me. I knew that was an area that Auburn was good at. I still think LSU has a good offensive line, but it’s not going to stop a really good front seven (possibly the best LSU will face) every time.
I did like how Burrow ran and threw across the backfield to avert the pass rush. I knew that would be necessary to avoid some of the rush. Having more quick, short-yardage plays helped LSU win the time of possession. This was more of a traditional LSU win in that way.
Another positive was the halftime adjustments. A good offensive coach like Dan Mullen or Gus Malzahn can come up with a scoring drive to start the half, but Florida didn’t score a second time in the whole half and Auburn didn’t score a second time until about 24 minutes of play later. Mississippi St.’s only score of the second half was in the closing minute. Northwestern St. and Utah St. were completely shut out in the respective second halves.
I hope that LSU is at least within a couple of scores of Alabama after the Tide’s opening drive of the second half. The Tigers could be ahead for all I know, but it really hurt their chances when Alabama scored a touchdown 75 seconds before the half last year to make it realistically a three-score game (two touchdowns and two two-point conversions isn’t necessarily realistic). Nine points instead of 16 would have mattered there. Nine points was the halftime deficit against Auburn two years ago, so I think that’s a good bare-minimum goal if we don’t have a good first half. I think the defense would give the offense a chance to catch up in the third and fourth quarters in that scenario.
Going back to the Auburn score to open the half, I thought that even though Auburn scored, it was a moral victory of sorts for the defense to come up with a stop inside the 10. LSU has been good at that this season. Auburn was good too, but hopefully Alabama isn’t as good at that if the Tigers have such chances in Tuscaloosa. LSU responded by driving to the one-yard line when they were stopped at fourth and goal, but the ball pretty much stayed on the Auburn half of the field until LSU scored to take the lead for good.
I’m not going to go into all the calls, but the officiating was terrible, so I was glad LSU was able to withstand that.
The hit on Burrow looked bad. I thought helmet-to-helmet hits when a guy is going out of bounds was against the rules. The TV rules expert said Burrow wasn’t defenseless, but I’ve certainly seen other players being tackled or going out of bounds ruled as defenseless. Those guys seem more like PR agents for the refs than unbiased arbiters anyway.
There was also kind of a hip check by an LSU defender that was called pass interference. I didn’t think it denied the opportunity to catch the ball, and the receiver wasn’t even looking for the ball. Pass interference should only be called when it conceivably could have been a catch without the interference, which was the case when there was a non-call in the end zone at the end of the first half. I’m not saying everything they called or didn’t call was in Auburn’s favor, but they definitely favored the visitors.
We had a couple of players, Tyrion Davis-Price and Derrick Dillon, who reacted to what should have been penalties on other players. That accounted for 30 of the 118 yards of penalties called on LSU. If the ref doesn’t call something, a player doesn’t need to make it worse by having them call a penalty on LSU. You also can’t count on offsetting penalties even when they’re deserved (which was a big part of the reason LSU lost to Alabama in 2014). The flags themselves were justified though.
Top-10 opponents
Anyway, LSU is now 8-2 against top-10 opponents over the last three seasons. You can guess who the two exceptions were. Alabama is 6-2 (losses to Clemson and Auburn), and Ohio St. is 6-1 (loss to Oklahoma). Those three teams happen to be in close to a three-way tie atop the AP poll this week.
The Tide has not played a top-10 team this season, and LSU has played three top-10 teams. How is this possible when they’re in the same division of the same conference? Alabama has not played Auburn yet (obviously), their best out-of-conference opponent was Duke (LSU’s was Texas when the Longhorns were still undefeated), and their annual cross-divisional rival is Tennessee (LSU’s is Florida).
Before someone says I’m wrong about the top-10 opponents, I know there was an ESPN graphic posted after the Florida game about how Alabama and Ohio St. had more wins over top-10 teams; but that was going back to 2016, the year that Les Miles coached 4 games before giving way to Orgeron. LSU beat three ranked teams that year, but none were in the top 10. This gave the other programs a head start, and I don’t think it’s really fair to expect an interim coach to beat top-10 teams anyway.
Race for #1
Most teams have played 8 games. A couple have even played 9. I think we’ve progressed far enough into the season to completely ignore last year from now on. That being the case, although Clemson is still what I’d call a good undefeated team, I no longer consider them #1. LSU’s best two opponents (Auburn and Florida) are better than Ohio St.’s best two opponents (Cincinnati and Wisconsin), but the Buckeyes have had a better schedule week to week. Indiana rates higher than Texas (I don’t care how they were ranked at the time of the game), Michigan St. rates higher than Utah St., Florida Atlantic rates higher than Mississippi St., and Nebraska rates higher than Georgia Southern. I don’t think anyone lower is worth mentioning.
I don’t put much of a premium on margin of victory, and it has nothing to do with why Ohio St. is #1 in my computer formula; but the way the games have played out also indicates to me that there are fewer teams that Ohio St. would struggle against than teams that LSU would struggle against.
Ohio St. is the clear #1 in both the weighted and unweighted versions of my formula as well. For instance, in the unweighted system, only 0.007 separates Penn St. from Clemson. In the weighted system, 0.24 separates the two. Ohio St’s respective leads over LSU are 0.093 (over 13 times the difference between Clemson and Penn St.) and 1.911 (about 8 times the difference between Clemson and Penn St.).
My educated guess is that if LSU and Ohio St. both win in two weeks, LSU will finally have enough points to go ahead, but it matters how prior opponents of the respective teams do and how opponents of those teams do over the next two weeks as well. Also, there is more reason to be skeptical that LSU will beat Alabama than there is that Ohio St. will beat Maryland.
I mention two weeks instead of next week because #1 Ohio St., #2 LSU, #4 Penn St., #6 Alabama, and #7 Minnesota all have byes next week. #3 Clemson plays Wofford, so I don’t think there is any concern of a major change among the top teams next week. If #5 SMU beats Memphis, the Mustangs may move up a spot or two; but that will probably be temporary given that SMU will not stand to gain many computer points by being East Carolina on November 9.
Kansas and the Big XII
Baylor, an undefeated team I haven’t mentioned much and possibly the last good hope for the Big XII (at least unless a series of losses by others puts one-loss Oklahoma back in the top 4), starts a challenging three-game stretch on November 9 as well. Unfortunately, they won’t be playing SMU since the Southwest Conference disbanded in 1995; but they travel to Forth Worth on that day before hosting Oklahoma and Texas in the subsequent two weeks. November 23, which is the day Baylor plays the last of those teams, is also a big day for currently-undefeated teams since Ohio St. plays Penn St. on that day.
I don’t know whose idea it was for Baylor to travel to Lawrence, Kansas, on Rivalry Week unless they thought it was basketball; but Les Miles’ Jayhawks have been looking good the past couple of weeks under new offensive coordinator Brent Dearmon. It might seem far-fetched for a team with only 3 wins right now to beat a team who’s currently undefeated, but something similar happened during Rivalry Week in 2001. Les Miles’ first Oklahoma St. team entered the game against #4 Oklahoma with only 3 wins and yet beat the Sooners. Games like that can be tough when it’s the closest thing the opponent will get to a bowl game.
KU would need some luck, but they certainly had that last night. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a team have the potential winning field goal blocked only to simply try again from a closer distance on the next play. Combined with the game in Austin I mentioned here, it was the second consecutive week that a field goal on the final play decided the winner in a Kansas game. Also, although Texas and Oklahoma may have seen better years, I don’t know how many teams can beat the two in consecutive weeks and still be ready to ward off a potential upset on the road. Maybe Baylor is just that special, but I have my doubts.
Top 25
NOTE: I only gave myself leeway of two spots from the computer ranking. This was only done for a handful of teams though.
Out of top 25: (25) Texas