theknightswhosay

Posts Tagged ‘top 25’

2022 Ratings Archive

In College Football, Rankings on October 15, 2023 at 2:42 PM

This is just for housekeeping purposes to make room for the weekly computer ratings that I’m in the process of beginning, so I’m sorry if any subscribers got their hopes up for an actual blog today. Every year I assemble the previous year’s computer ratings into a blog post to add to the general ratings page (where I have now included the first computer rating, though I have not adopted it at my personal top 25). The latest computer rating can be located at any time by clicking the “Knights’ Ratings” heading above. I never got around to publishing the full final ratings for last year, but I did complete the final top 25 in preparation for the first rankings for this year.

12/04/2022

Rank Team Unweighted Rank Weighted Rank Total
1 Georgia 1.467486 1 39.767486 1 100.000000
2 Michigan 1.277718 2 25.577718 8 91.189279
3 TCU 1.115859 3 24.257204 11 85.740527
4 Ohio St. 1.006056 4 20.538678 15 81.503272
5 Southern CA 0.941728 6 29.434368 2 81.142942
6 Tennessee 0.908412 7 23.192901 12 78.877484
7 Clemson 0.953643 5 14.153027 22 78.597141
8 Alabama 0.882166 8 22.743257 13 77.948838
9 Kansas St. 0.847221 9 26.131778 7 77.476409
10 Utah 0.754370 13 29.100189 3 75.064676
11 Penn St. 0.822397 10 11.107334 17 73.821521
12 Tulane 0.774662 12 19.213364 32 73.800494
13 LSU 0.798850 11 3.958283 5 71.745958
14 Troy 0.665127 15 26.730966 55 71.674719
15 Texas 0.621924 17 27.669429 4 70.538970
16 Oregon 0.617364 19 26.260009 6 70.122502
17 Oregon St. 0.621299 18 24.703196 9 69.950507
18 TX San Anton’ 0.702000 14 6.756842 44 69.102059
19 Florida St. 0.635297 16 13.335308 24 68.221470
20 Washington 0.600723 20 13.963309 23 67.232002
21 UCLA 0.544980 22 21.359746 14 66.859947
22 Boise St. 0.582930 21 9.249594 34 65.757562
23 S Carolina 0.512022 23 16.342323 18 64.840540
24 Notre Dame 0.460636 28 24.684201 10 64.789545
25 Mississippi St. 0.488595 25 15.340056 19 63.896481
26 Ole Miss 0.484908 26 14.385329 21 63.595181
27 S. Alabama 0.495104 24 11.728335 28 63.413306
28 N Carolina 0.473536 27 2.178145 61 60.890917
29 C. Florida 0.441547 29 6.816264 43 60.752857
30 N Carolina St. 0.410079 31 9.097199 36 60.179817
31 Fresno St. 0.427167 30 0.521584 46 59.109802
32 Coastal Car. 0.393508 32 6.289218 66 59.085024
33 Kentucky 0.389967 33 3.923988 25 58.584748
34 Cincinnati 0.337528 34 12.926776 56 58.542898
35 Purdue 0.336537 35 5.463950 51 57.122883
36 Louisville 0.297621 41 7.037069 42 56.175100
37 Pittsburgh 0.314902 38 3.251194 57 56.004376
38 Texas Tech 0.304358 39 4.266016 54 55.860369
39 Illinois 0.321274 37 0.638804 65 55.708308
40 Syracuse 0.278690 42 7.422968 40 55.641353
41 Jms Madison 0.333869 36 -3.345980 76 55.349034
42 Wake Forest 0.273016 43 6.718150 45 55.324181
43 Maryland 0.243528 45 11.523258 29 55.298358
44 Wash. St. 0.303536 40 -2.540688 16 54.682893
45 So. Methodist 0.240234 46 8.671840 37 54.646217
46 Air Force 0.175075 54 19.778305 72 54.529645
47 Oklahoma St. 0.212282 50 8.025078 38 53.625022
48 W. Kentucky 0.219847 49 5.498452 50 53.383695
49 Arkansas 0.267902 44 -3.508618 59 53.264739
50 Ohio 0.233552 47 2.581809 77 53.200316
51 Florida 0.134894 60 14.614171 20 52.403489
52 Houston 0.204894 51 1.183068 63 52.076777
53 Marshall 0.227199 48 -3.118626 73 51.968473
54 Minnesota 0.202890 52 0.442318 67 51.870492
55 East Carolina 0.193192 53 -0.349451 68 51.407484
56 Kansas 0.145850 57 6.119978 48 51.127478
57 Iowa 0.144702 58 6.186802 47 51.103440
58 Oklahoma 0.140814 59 4.963996 53 50.744323
59 BYU 0.171133 55 -3.964765 81 50.006580
60 Missouri 0.097018 62 7.723734 39 49.867270
61 Baylor 0.108909 61 5.001984 52 49.727434
62 Auburn 0.067364 67 11.508525 30 49.640633
63 Wisconsin 0.087505 63 5.773266 49 49.188157
64 Duke 0.151141 56 -6.679134 88 48.844708
65 Toledo 0.073962 66 -3.187964 74 47.036249
66 Michigan St. -0.022141 73 11.804918 27 46.824303
67 Vanderbilt 0.080888 64 -8.910271 33 46.279470
68 Wyoming -0.023971 74 9.268295 92 46.162015
69 San Diego St. 0.046440 69 -3.594176 78 46.074919
70 San Jose St. 0.075547 65 -9.480663 95 45.881284
71 Southern MS 0.005295 71 2.280131 60 45.879814
72 Arizona -0.054068 80 12.208778 26 45.876824
73 North Texas 0.058861 68 -11.556960 75 44.973611
74 Liberty 0.009805 70 -3.204512 99 44.947773
75 Memphis -0.015705 72 -5.543952 86 43.706451
76 La. Lafayette -0.041779 77 -3.807475 80 43.202205
77 West Virginia -0.070149 83 0.927822 64 43.198922
78 Ala. B’ham -0.051392 78 -5.463270 85 42.576349
79 Utah St. -0.040473 76 -7.759915 91 42.486732
80 Bowling Grn -0.030893 75 -9.600915 96 42.441483
81 Middle Ten. -0.064200 81 -6.569318 87 41.953263
82 Texas A&M -0.083841 85 -4.144471 82 41.787431
83 App. St. -0.068684 82 -7.457817 90 41.639066
84 Ga. Southern -0.053859 79 -14.035524 101 40.854481
85 E. Michigan -0.070581 84 -11.500855 98 40.803431
86 Iowa St. -0.127746 86 -2.156483 71 40.759007
87 Connecticut -0.139713 87 -6.687493 89 39.506608
88 U. Miami -0.167537 89 -5.258466 83 38.887301
89 Indiana -0.204367 93 -0.907259 70 38.538837
90 Buffalo -0.146024 88 -16.272201 105 37.467385
91 Kent St. -0.191411 91 -9.025616 93 37.399062
92 Georgia Tech -0.271597 97 2.612141 58 37.055141
93 Stanford -0.176437 90 -17.196964 31 36.507003
94 Navy -0.340242 100 11.250770 108 36.313905
95 Tulsa -0.233480 96 -11.015011 97 35.667433
96 Miami U. -0.212941 94 -15.801490 104 35.409512
97 Fla. Atlantic -0.201108 92 -18.324879 110 35.305809
98 Cal (Berkeley) -0.363543 102 7.112294 41 34.965986
99 Virginia -0.227852 95 -17.400180 109 34.624527
100 Rice -0.287431 98 -9.425079 94 34.240236
101 Rutgers -0.384990 104 -0.584359 69 32.802675
102 La. Monroe -0.372140 103 -3.772946 79 32.604142
103 Army -0.422970 108 -5.440811 84 30.652906
104 Arizona St. -0.476896 112 1.604488 62 30.271905
105 W. Michigan -0.338648 99 -23.885640 120 29.825185
106 Ball St. -0.357287 101 -23.149040 102 29.412283
107 Georgia St. -0.409165 106 -14.227582 119 29.368016
108 Nebraska -0.409618 107 -16.899175 107 28.885807
109 UNLV -0.398504 105 -22.177078 117 28.231185
110 UTEP -0.427403 109 -19.026198 111 27.907313
111 Boston Coll -0.474441 111 -13.286336 100 27.497281
112 C. Michigan -0.453460 110 -19.209588 112 27.035737
113 Colorado -0.654748 121 9.198656 35 26.018049
114 Colorado St. -0.511809 114 -20.105791 113 24.990978
115 Texas St. -0.506130 113 -21.293908 115 24.945593
116 Virginia Tech -0.524918 115 -20.119085 114 24.567640
117 New Mex. St. -0.533034 116 -21.638574 116 24.015938
118 La. Tech -0.595162 118 -16.686445 106 22.970570
119 Arkansas St. -0.613742 119 -15.420299 103 22.616760
120 Old Dominion -0.544987 117 -28.351779 125 22.345812
121 Florida Int’l -0.670287 122 -22.840577 118 19.379744
122 Charlotte -0.636218 120 -30.253564 128 19.052855
123 Hawaii -0.712880 123 -25.355557 122 17.530579
124 Temple -0.741064 124 -30.055685 127 15.725214
125 New Mexico -0.773969 125 -27.954284 124 15.071632
126 Northwestern -0.794561 128 -24.577430 121 15.057686
127 Akron -0.788167 127 -28.570989 126 14.497677
128 N. Illinois -0.787745 126 -32.752086 129 13.710039
129 South Florida -0.852483 129 -27.811801 123 12.578617
130 Nevada Reno -0.867991 130 -34.853801 130 10.731365
131 Massachusetts -1.175749 131 -39.301378 131 0.000000

12/04/2022 Conferences

1 SEC 62.270597
2 Big XII 57.827488
3 Pac-12 54.722675
4 Big Ten 52.030266
5 ACC 50.181369
6 AAC 45.042749
7 Sun Belt 43.241221
8 MWC 38.085806
9 CUSA 37.363757
10 Independents 36.254959
11 MAC 34.061501

11/27/2022

Rank Team Unweighted Rank Weighted Rank Total
1 Georgia 1.312403 1 30.812403 1 100.000000
2 Michigan 1.149896 2 23.549896 6 92.535665
3 TCU 1.148479 3 16.948479 16 90.276196
4 Southern CA 0.974747 5 25.744169 4 87.854277
5 Ohio St. 0.992622 4 19.431626 13 86.288515
6 Tennessee 0.913346 6 22.749100 10 84.949744
7 Alabama 0.884287 7 17.820147 15 82.396545
8 Penn St. 0.781915 9 18.340502 14 79.404523
9 Clemson 0.818713 8 12.832769 24 78.694215
10 LSU 0.702671 10 23.419597 7 78.657985
11 Oregon St. 0.619985 16 30.386364 2 78.438559
12 Texas 0.609300 17 26.186449 3 76.698408
13 Oregon 0.607584 18 24.934535 5 76.225150
14 Utah 0.583171 21 22.908063 9 74.789830
15 Kansas St. 0.654314 12 12.433192 26 73.474782
16 UCLA 0.533669 22 23.213119 8 73.360986
17 Tulane 0.678248 11 9.876109 35 73.356888
18 Florida St. 0.639667 15 12.001986 28 72.876997
19 Boise St. 0.639987 14 11.416162 30 72.690255
20 Washington 0.597787 20 14.802428 18 72.521449
21 Notre Dame 0.462478 30 21.567620 12 70.606567
22 Troy 0.652180 13 3.237916 57 70.322551
23 S Carolina 0.505432 24 12.971494 23 69.050114
24 Mississippi St. 0.489998 25 13.812945 20 68.855113
25 TX San Anton’ 0.602329 19 2.493095 61 68.530525
26 S. Alabama 0.488854 26 12.662107 25 68.433485
27 Ole Miss 0.477522 28 13.349629 22 68.313682
28 C. Florida 0.479742 27 5.183245 48 65.641463
29 N Carolina 0.517742 23 -0.059660 69 65.057233
30 N Carolina St. 0.411306 31 8.353730 37 64.588652
31 Kentucky 0.334550 34 12.108557 27 63.474612
32 Coastal Car. 0.470542 29 -1.068334 73 63.258637
33 Cincinnati 0.389867 32 4.631655 51 62.676229
34 Purdue 0.377916 33 3.787616 54 62.023274
35 Wash. St. 0.172414 55 21.749026 11 61.694944
36 Fresno St. 0.248585 44 11.967799 29 60.768249
37 Louisville 0.300661 40 5.882383 45 60.336638
38 Pittsburgh 0.318445 38 3.811226 52 60.191579
39 Texas Tech 0.300599 41 4.873227 49 59.995999
40 Ohio 0.331618 36 1.794124 64 59.922055
41 Syracuse 0.279187 42 6.401360 43 59.846556
42 Maryland 0.237577 46 10.185304 34 59.829477
43 Air Force 0.305364 39 3.803955 53 59.784531
44 Wake Forest 0.273555 43 5.764951 46 59.458738
45 So. Methodist 0.241234 45 8.335527 38 59.321739
46 Illinois 0.322401 37 0.805826 66 59.305268
47 Jms Madison 0.334217 35 -2.529568 79 58.551304
48 W. Kentucky 0.217279 49 7.273066 40 58.224154
49 Florida 0.126526 60 13.561467 21 57.527509
50 Arkansas 0.235193 47 2.573362 59 57.200909
51 BYU 0.183689 54 7.204787 41 57.162189
52 Oklahoma St. 0.209379 50 3.760579 55 56.800878
53 Houston 0.198588 52 2.364112 62 55.998381
54 Minnesota 0.201730 51 1.827590 63 55.915482
55 Marshall 0.229668 48 -1.364472 75 55.708342
56 Iowa 0.146294 57 6.184064 44 55.662881
57 East Carolina 0.195551 53 0.747635 68 55.361885
58 Auburn 0.066185 66 10.964300 31 54.789272
59 Missouri 0.089630 62 7.064642 42 54.205665
60 Kansas 0.143307 58 0.922901 65 53.804650
61 Wisconsin 0.086965 63 5.640805 47 53.645333
62 Oklahoma 0.138534 59 0.798681 67 53.615328
63 Arizona -0.059377 81 15.248656 17 52.343275
64 Baylor 0.105650 61 -0.673130 71 52.104158
65 Michigan St. -0.024006 72 10.943109 32 51.992318
66 Duke 0.153826 56 -5.664661 89 51.919039
67 San Diego St. 0.031179 69 2.503368 60 50.866689
68 Vanderbilt -0.027169 73 7.806811 39 50.841827
69 Wyoming 0.080916 64 -3.306929 80 50.455054
70 Southern MS -0.006585 70 3.213180 58 49.936775
71 North Texas 0.055762 68 -4.298342 86 49.344243
72 Georgia Tech -0.040300 75 3.713200 56 49.061687
73 San Jose St. 0.070102 65 -8.450895 96 48.394065
74 Liberty 0.057212 67 -9.579392 99 47.616601
75 Utah St. -0.029605 74 -1.928843 77 47.498854
76 Memphis -0.015047 71 -3.835908 84 47.309114
77 La. Lafayette -0.045873 77 -2.298231 78 46.871668
78 Ala. B’ham -0.046317 78 -3.913088 85 46.315954
79 Toledo -0.050727 79 -3.691648 83 46.253851
80 West Virginia -0.071666 83 -3.464771 81 45.682299
81 Texas A&M -0.077366 85 -3.518956 82 45.487798
82 Middle Ten. -0.066448 82 -4.586080 87 45.467366
83 Bowling Green -0.045500 76 -7.521174 93 45.130233
84 App. St. -0.076562 84 -5.468356 88 44.858373
85 Iowa St. -0.124328 87 -1.450639 76 44.729325
86 E. Michigan -0.079933 86 -9.505997 98 43.398951
87 Ga. Southern -0.053120 80 -12.012277 101 43.387156
88 Stanford -0.341861 100 14.130332 19 43.229880
89 Connecticut -0.149225 88 -6.084376 91 42.403937
90 Indiana -0.206493 94 -0.860235 72 42.385879
91 Army -0.203645 92 -1.246921 74 42.344183
92 U. Miami -0.166327 90 -5.703296 90 42.002830
93 Cal (Berkeley) -0.363602 103 9.643907 36 41.051580
94 Kent St. -0.204104 93 -7.790622 95 40.133716
95 Tulsa -0.236916 98 -8.965777 97 38.724327
96 Navy -0.163195 89 -15.780030 111 38.717649
97 Rice -0.285908 99 -6.452113 92 38.052528
98 Fla. Atlantic -0.190099 91 -15.589664 110 37.949315
99 Miami U. -0.216566 96 -13.804876 105 37.729652
100 Buffalo -0.209029 95 -15.015311 107 37.556537
101 Virginia -0.220216 97 -15.286791 108 37.119381
102 Rutgers -0.386743 105 -0.643708 70 36.882914
103 Arizona St. -0.482551 112 4.833913 50 35.757753
104 La. Monroe -0.379311 104 -7.751916 94 34.727049
105 Colorado -0.654736 121 10.745849 33 32.415850
106 UTEP -0.419150 109 -11.497957 100 32.237426
107 Ball St. -0.417110 108 -12.831844 102 31.852849
108 W. Michigan -0.346079 101 -21.171729 121 31.250889
109 Nebraska -0.409417 107 -15.568934 109 31.172160
110 Georgia St. -0.356714 102 -20.947413 120 30.997213
111 Boston College -0.476824 111 -12.929460 103 29.972943
112 UNLV -0.403032 106 -20.103198 118 29.847815
113 C. Michigan -0.471932 110 -16.804813 113 28.823585
114 Colorado St. -0.510042 113 -13.439257 104 28.774309
115 Virginia Tech -0.520545 114 -17.378231 114 27.127398
116 Texas St. -0.521057 115 -18.986946 115 26.571626
117 New Mex. St. -0.550384 117 -19.545473 116 25.477000
118 La. Tech -0.599700 118 -16.103801 112 25.106637
119 Arkansas St. -0.621238 119 -14.133090 106 25.101832
120 Old Dominion -0.540530 116 -25.841863 126 23.668524
121 Florida Int’l -0.677637 122 -19.756928 117 21.469730
122 Charlotte -0.640188 120 -27.162747 128 20.142476
123 Akron -0.713902 123 -22.429246 123 19.451010
124 Hawaii -0.725590 124 -23.728310 124 18.653488
125 New Mexico -0.777439 126 -20.244524 119 18.218923
126 Northwestern -0.792856 127 -22.178543 122 17.092894
127 Temple -0.742537 125 -27.091410 127 17.000499
128 N. Illinois -0.796412 128 -29.329668 130 14.582746
129 South Florida -0.855092 129 -25.033860 125 14.209422
130 Nevada Reno -0.879465 130 -27.344075 129 12.680115
131 Massachusetts -1.202006 131 -35.397585 131 0.000000

11/27/2022 Conferences

1 SEC 66.839341
2 Pac-12 60.806961
3 Big XII 60.718202
4 Big Ten 56.009756
5 ACC 54.160992
6 AAC 48.028872
7 Sun Belt 45.885324
8 MWC 41.552696
9 Independents 40.801497
10 CUSA 40.258214
11 MAC 36.340506

11/20/2022

Rank Team Unweighted Rank Weighted Rank Total
1 Georgia 1.207585 1 25.007585 3 100.000000
2 Ohio St. 1.095223 2 25.395223 2 96.417290
3 TCU 1.072256 3 20.872256 8 94.308727
4 Michigan 0.970057 4 19.770057 9 90.615002
5 Clemson 0.901038 5 22.613312 6 89.193314
6 LSU 0.814496 8 26.784531 1 87.591979
7 Southern Calif. 0.832168 6 22.362273 7 86.851229
8 Tennessee 0.802743 9 24.323924 4 86.469277
9 Alabama 0.817220 7 18.556082 10 85.220971
10 Penn St. 0.685801 10 17.383817 11 80.544455
11 Oregon 0.656195 11 17.018632 13 79.460708
12 Utah 0.548092 16 16.970206 14 75.887781
13 Florida St. 0.572641 14 13.860086 16 75.765778
14 Troy 0.588604 13 11.315518 18 75.530317
15 Notre Dame 0.547164 17 14.522489 15 75.125252
16 Oregon St. 0.462128 27 23.092142 5 74.888769
17 N Carolina 0.602433 12 6.055533 28 74.412562
18 Texas 0.516950 22 10.952958 19 73.063243
19 Ole Miss 0.530570 19 8.824706 22 72.875153
20 Tulane 0.531301 18 8.653592 24 72.848034
21 Kansas St. 0.553995 15 5.674820 30 72.704291
22 TX San Anton’ 0.518274 21 5.710680 29 71.539150
23 UCLA 0.471542 26 10.401765 20 71.403703
24 Washington 0.491154 24 7.075450 27 71.054558
25 Coastal Car. 0.522670 20 3.526982 37 71.030858
26 S. Alabama 0.441166 28 12.118300 17 70.917127
27 Boise St. 0.511779 23 2.590178 43 70.392211
28 Cincinnati 0.416721 29 3.071090 39 67.406963
29 C. Florida 0.476344 25 -4.533085 64 67.095624
30 Mississippi St. 0.360477 31 7.588237 25 66.906377
31 Wake Forest 0.345863 32 5.489881 33 65.797836
32 Oklahoma St. 0.322101 34 7.124507 26 65.504476
33 Wash. St. 0.225473 42 17.050227 12 65.291960
34 Louisville 0.368611 30 -1.362278 57 64.497540
35 Purdue 0.321687 35 2.606352 42 64.139734
36 N Carolina St. 0.292068 39 5.641044 31 64.072248
37 S Carolina 0.323956 33 -1.012655 56 63.132176
38 Iowa 0.282530 40 3.345137 38 63.071709
39 Houston 0.301174 37 -0.653342 55 62.489710
40 Syracuse 0.249088 41 1.487175 47 61.415271
41 Texas Tech 0.223224 43 3.800634 35 61.255723
42 Arkansas 0.293021 38 -4.175839 62 61.167966
43 Pittsburgh 0.219471 44 2.785086 41 60.828502
44 Illinois 0.310247 36 -7.691055 74 60.683784
45 Fresno St. 0.130430 60 8.665690 23 59.656055
46 Ohio 0.207880 46 -0.180531 51 59.560101
47 Florida 0.155123 55 5.507505 32 59.524461
48 Kentucky 0.199163 48 0.579572 50 59.500465
49 BYU 0.165349 53 3.604673 36 59.292023
50 Oklahoma 0.181880 50 0.607227 49 58.939828
51 Auburn 0.095952 63 10.032906 21 58.929988
52 Air Force 0.174351 51 -0.547873 54 58.346568
53 Marshall 0.149891 58 0.970530 48 57.995475
54 Jms Madison 0.201088 47 -5.021014 67 57.889014
55 Kansas 0.209338 45 -6.751448 70 57.643108
56 Wisconsin 0.125410 61 2.012854 44 57.501331
57 Maryland 0.191733 49 -6.532142 69 57.129196
58 Liberty 0.169187 52 -4.624951 65 56.957359
59 San Diego St. 0.082312 65 4.110901 34 56.710073
60 S. Methodist 0.152467 57 -4.216112 63 56.529234
61 W. Kentucky 0.139845 59 -3.406316 60 56.355946
62 Minnesota 0.091637 64 -0.212492 52 55.724130
63 East Carolina 0.154835 56 -10.301319 79 54.787476
64 Duke 0.077590 66 -3.087030 58 54.402128
65 Vanderbilt 0.020672 69 2.978307 40 54.342354
66 Baylor 0.161957 54 -13.033600 87 54.204844
67 Wyoming 0.107352 62 -7.361533 72 54.103576
68 Georgia Tech 0.015118 71 1.904101 45 53.838307
69 Toledo 0.058629 67 -3.162591 59 53.755396
70 App. St. 0.000659 72 -0.368685 53 52.682681
71 Michigan St. -0.004938 73 -4.970106 66 51.122435
72 Memphis 0.031858 68 -10.053640 76 50.813459
73 Missouri -0.012054 74 -6.081144 68 50.555925
74 San Jose St. 0.015522 70 -11.923257 83 49.716626
75 Bowling Green -0.018975 75 -10.493885 80 49.008506
76 Arizona -0.086022 80 -3.992764 61 48.745617
77 Utah St. -0.030513 76 -12.468038 86 48.038355
78 Iowa St. -0.075900 78 -7.619287 73 47.994335
79 North Texas -0.035840 77 -13.693320 89 47.496617
80 Middle Ten. -0.120330 84 -8.933262 75 46.138883
81 Southern MS -0.081917 79 -13.702875 90 45.977007
82 U. Miami -0.127326 85 -10.188765 77 45.533152
83 Stanford -0.248337 97 1.818148 46 45.140349
84 La. Lafayette -0.113044 82 -13.715125 91 44.948737
85 Ala. B’ham -0.094648 81 -15.993637 97 44.872920
86 Buffalo -0.115267 83 -14.784194 95 44.555851
87 E. Michigan -0.144352 86 -13.949781 94 43.848004
88 Indiana -0.174238 92 -11.686468 82 43.541061
89 Connecticut -0.173175 91 -13.925662 93 42.906440
90 Army -0.194184 93 -11.664387 81 42.891092
91 Texas A&M -0.196098 94 -12.047854 84 42.713401
92 West Virginia -0.170781 90 -16.613587 98 42.181417
93 Fla. Atlantic -0.151659 87 -18.781427 104 42.162593
94 Ga. Southern -0.157811 88 -18.247963 102 42.119629
95 Rice -0.220822 96 -13.308088 88 41.522699
96 Virginia -0.213941 95 -17.998185 100 40.346673
97 Cal (Berkeley) -0.319809 100 -6.773095 71 40.218550
98 Navy -0.168925 89 -27.272444 118 39.055068
99 La. Monroe -0.304487 98 -13.811206 92 38.618218
100 Rutgers -0.347717 104 -12.376707 85 37.624175
101 Arizona St. -0.385899 108 -10.202764 78 37.017416
102 Georgia St. -0.310410 99 -20.255111 108 36.496246
103 Tulsa -0.340146 103 -18.020873 101 36.185542
104 Miami U. -0.337952 102 -18.713902 103 36.050529
105 Kent St. -0.335896 101 -19.115818 107 35.998017
106 Ball St. -0.375990 106 -15.136641 96 35.868161
107 C. Michigan -0.381395 107 -18.909169 106 34.562092
108 UTEP -0.373891 105 -20.744420 109 34.260298
109 Boston College -0.386533 109 -21.028697 110 33.759155
110 Texas St. -0.426680 110 -18.891156 105 33.076835
111 UNLV -0.429996 111 -24.506442 111 31.288460
112 W. Michigan -0.436067 112 -28.149487 119 29.999205
113 La. Tech -0.525150 116 -25.895097 114 27.741003
114 Virginia Tech -0.517015 115 -27.272109 117 27.596976
115 Colorado -0.621723 121 -17.492677 99 27.074755
116 Old Dominion -0.481882 113 -33.422128 123 26.914355
117 Colorado St. -0.558976 117 -24.947731 112 26.910841
118 Nebraska -0.513421 114 -30.163596 120 26.850611
119 Arkansas St. -0.560007 118 -26.804928 115 26.321511
120 Florida Int’l -0.579913 119 -25.319372 113 26.110508
121 New Mex. St. -0.642614 122 -27.150241 116 23.499046
122 N. Illinois -0.601807 120 -35.331179 126 22.395870
123 New Mexico -0.705270 125 -30.298343 121 20.495181
124 Charlotte -0.643768 123 -38.927887 128 19.939030
125 Temple -0.697289 124 -33.964851 124 19.661422
126 Northwestern -0.741362 126 -34.929646 125 17.922173
127 Hawaii -0.767485 127 -33.366128 122 17.529820
128 Akron -0.769002 128 -35.548430 127 16.827293
129 South Florida -0.824005 129 -39.587083 129 13.809014
130 Nevada Reno -0.844224 130 -42.306105 130 12.330335
131 Massachusetts -1.155239 131 -49.303700 131 0.000000

11/20/2022 Conferences

1 SEC 67.780749
2 Big XII 62.779999
3 Pac-12 60.252950
4 ACC 57.961389
5 Big Ten 57.349078
6 AAC 49.152868
7 Sun Belt 48.608429
8 Independents 42.953030
9 MWC 42.126509
10 CUSA 41.649059
11 MAC 38.535752

11/13/2022

The numbers to the right of the teams are unweighted rating (rank), weighted rating (rank), and overall rating.

1 Georgia 1.062739 1 17.61273949 4 100.0000
2 Ohio St. 0.976957 3 18.77695669 3 96.8330
3 TCU 0.980259 2 14.78025851 6 96.0359
4 Tennessee 0.870611 4 23.36203687 1 93.6375
5 Michigan 0.859728 5 19.40972772 2 92.2822
6 Clemson 0.810137 6 9.764088849 9 88.0518
7 Alabama 0.742976 7 11.78084311 7 85.8293
8 LSU 0.723664 8 7.971761692 13 84.1696
9 Southern Calif. 0.667933 9 15.58738592 5 83.7072
10 North Carolina 0.649103 10 5.103055336 16 80.5144
11 Penn St. 0.599812 11 11.68216792 8 80.0691
12 Utah 0.596502 12 3.18865385 19 77.9612
13 UCLA 0.544537 14 6.117306389 15 76.5598
14 Oregon 0.524362 16 8.660814903 10 76.3428
15 Notre Dame 0.522819 17 8.367850461 12 76.2129
16 Ole Miss 0.528818 15 5.082001681 17 75.6891
17 C. Florida 0.571025 13 -2.073381277 33 75.7165
18 Florida St. 0.483872 21 8.508513963 11 74.6848
19 Coastal Car. 0.513098 18 2.625475231 20 74.4879
20 Troy 0.501515 19 0.623112705 26 73.5580
21 Kansas St. 0.489013 20 -2.427373505 35 72.3476
22 Washington 0.476177 22 -2.008973664 32 71.9305
23 Tulane 0.430438 23 2.194818134 23 71.0752
24 TX San Anton’ 0.428398 24 1.776648243 24 70.8961
25 Oklahoma St. 0.409803 25 1.616334931 25 70.1137
26 Oregon St. 0.402147 27 2.568721894 21 70.0283
27 S. Alabama 0.386334 28 4.462069114 18 69.8349
28 N. Carolina St. 0.356749 30 2.377376236 22 68.1645
29 Texas 0.408736 26 -7.670911745 50 67.9111
30 Liberty 0.348919 31 -1.362920643 29 66.9809
31 Cincinnati 0.347162 32 -1.539031881 31 66.8695
32 Boise St. 0.382849 29 -9.217151274 54 66.5141
33 Mississippi St. 0.310142 36 -0.438244839 27 65.6420
34 Purdue 0.320879 34 -4.146204025 37 65.2100
35 Syracuse 0.312495 35 -6.347852241 45 64.3620
36 Illinois 0.324520 33 -8.568142729 53 64.3275
37 Florida 0.221552 40 6.271482554 14 63.6521
38 Kansas 0.273276 37 -9.903575654 56 61.9634
39 Kentucky 0.206782 44 -0.918233246 28 61.3882
40 Wake Forest 0.221298 41 -6.325825677 44 60.7124
41 Louisville 0.250813 38 -11.25466336 58 60.7490
42 Maryland 0.218517 42 -8.137647967 51 60.1796
43 Minnesota 0.165584 51 -1.452598669 30 59.6129
44 Toledo 0.168674 50 -2.106454644 34 59.5847
45 Iowa 0.183035 46 -4.989520727 40 59.4897
46 S. Methodist 0.177683 48 -5.94809537 43 59.0524
47 Baylor 0.231040 39 -13.86518555 66 59.3495
48 East Carolina 0.212103 43 -14.46011136 67 58.4522
49 Ohio 0.142239 55 -4.812197781 39 57.8961
50 Washington St. 0.142694 54 -5.559210334 41 57.7406
51 Texas Tech 0.168767 49 -9.561026915 55 57.8548
52 Houston 0.184228 45 -11.95242587 60 57.9183
53 Duke 0.120200 56 -3.474557625 36 57.3240
54 Wyoming 0.143800 53 -8.170147378 52 57.1778
55 W. Kentucky 0.177999 47 -14.77745245 68 57.0117
56 Pittsburgh 0.106735 59 -4.785188422 38 56.4796
57 South Carolina 0.101184 61 -7.655756702 49 55.5895
58 Michigan St. 0.094703 63 -6.948183835 47 55.4944
59 James Madison 0.114086 57 -10.36041894 57 55.4776
60 San Diego St. 0.080954 65 -6.801688309 46 54.9774
61 Air Force 0.104981 60 -11.43631447 59 54.8625
62 Fresno St. 0.110386 58 -12.54952721 63 54.8202
63 BYU 0.158720 52 -19.79385631 79 55.0725
64 Wisconsin 0.072174 66 -7.462337824 48 54.4719
65 Arkansas 0.097185 62 -12.52935546 62 54.2959
66 Oklahoma 0.083771 64 -12.6371899 64 53.7333
67 San Jose St. 0.069205 67 -12.47720065 61 53.1867
68 Auburn -0.035436 74 -5.911984632 42 50.5201
69 Memphis 0.020065 68 -18.75735554 75 49.7570
70 Marshall -0.009154 72 -16.19797806 72 49.1812
71 Connecticut -0.015393 73 -15.68921243 69 49.0495
72 Southern MS -0.008976 71 -20.45175852 83 48.1991
73 North Texas 0.014632 69 -24.79741227 97 48.1346
74 Iowa St. -0.005771 70 -22.59634677 91 47.8288
75 Arizona -0.043527 76 -20.06614079 81 46.9042
76 App. St. -0.084795 81 -16.05598058 71 46.1830
77 Vanderbilt -0.105694 84 -13.23230409 65 46.0021
78 Alabama B’ham -0.035636 75 -23.63778744 95 46.3898
79 La. Lafayette -0.046750 77 -22.90843598 93 46.1140
80 Missouri -0.076577 80 -18.88889375 76 45.8535
81 Ga. Southern -0.063437 78 -21.6670769 86 45.7340
82 Fla. Atlantic -0.075542 79 -21.29483918 85 45.3354
83 Utah St. -0.100173 83 -20.09470037 82 44.6275
84 Buffalo -0.088095 82 -22.66350538 92 44.5141
85 Georgia Tech -0.150997 88 -17.41648011 73 43.2135
86 U. Miami -0.143556 87 -19.11993613 77 43.1156
87 West Virginia -0.129590 85 -21.9497279 88 43.0172
88 E. Michigan -0.163590 90 -19.62008511 78 42.1964
89 Bowling Green -0.151589 89 -23.84239125 96 41.6954
90 Stanford -0.136706 86 -27.24487303 101 41.5006
91 Middle Ten. -0.190997 91 -22.19139692 89 40.5001
92 C. Michigan -0.231524 93 -21.06594262 84 39.1378
93 Rice -0.232482 94 -22.35720044 90 38.7991
94 Indiana -0.243684 96 -21.75960518 87 38.4891
95 Rutgers -0.289085 100 -15.94425497 70 38.0221
96 Kent St. -0.249228 97 -23.23151536 94 37.9246
97 Virginia -0.231203 92 -28.96920547 104 37.3127
98 Texas A&M -0.238825 95 -28.93995761 103 37.0140
99 Ball St. -0.311605 102 -18.44488521 74 36.5381
100 La. Monroe -0.311939 103 -19.89113994 80 36.1883
101 Army -0.280382 99 -26.04505355 99 36.0218
102 Arizona St. -0.304484 101 -25.72059666 98 35.1314
103 UNLV -0.256703 98 -33.25474422 111 35.2941
104 Georgia St. -0.326345 105 -26.67285859 100 34.0339
105 Navy -0.316865 104 -35.25528317 114 32.4179
106 Tulsa -0.344351 106 -33.37117241 112 31.7546
107 La. Tech -0.371675 108 -29.69076385 105 31.5155
108 Cal (Berkeley) -0.356303 107 -32.64909538 109 31.4435
109 Boston College -0.378862 109 -33.47468304 113 30.3475
110 Miami U. -0.426029 111 -30.17424371 106 29.2248
111 Arkansas St. -0.428364 112 -32.12601026 108 28.6773
112 Texas St. -0.448505 114 -30.59992887 107 28.2251
113 UTEP -0.419475 110 -35.92343424 115 28.1504
114 Florida Int’l -0.452555 116 -33.0767788 110 27.4868
115 Old Dominion -0.433499 113 -38.47981919 118 26.9939
116 Nebraska -0.450399 115 -36.40593516 116 26.7990
117 New Mex. St. -0.546477 120 -28.87600814 102 24.6998
118 W. Michigan -0.479608 117 -39.50159275 120 24.9085
119 Colorado St. -0.500119 118 -37.78169613 117 24.4865
120 N. Illinois -0.504055 119 -39.91185672 121 23.8334
121 Colorado -0.555731 121 -40.21480926 122 21.6920
122 Virginia Tech -0.606821 122 -39.03964075 119 19.9179
123 New Mexico -0.643889 123 -41.90777917 124 17.7654
124 Temple -0.678887 124 -40.73234398 123 16.6362
125 Northwestern -0.696518 127 -44.43183249 125 15.0693
126 South Florida -0.690738 125 -45.60461736 126 15.0282
127 UNC-Charlotte -0.690923 126 -53.56243276 130 13.1702
128 Akron -0.766248 128 -49.56263793 127 11.0817
129 Nevada (Reno) -0.793166 129 -49.6031862 128 9.9936
130 Hawaii -0.849858 130 -50.13064408 129 7.5990
131 Massachusetts -1.006195 131 -55.86612592 131 0.0000

11/13/2022 Conferences

1 SEC 65.663067
2 Big XII 63.015525
3 Big Ten 57.596422
4 Pac-12 57.578522
5 ACC 56.067819
6 AAC 48.607095
7 Sun Belt 47.349170
8 Independents 44.005351
9 CUSA 40.671798
10 MWC 40.108746
11 MAC 37.377968

11/06/2022

1 Georgia 0.907537
2 Ohio St. 0.888818
3 TCU 0.832712
4 Michigan 0.793757
5 Tennessee 0.786494
6 Clemson 0.720248
7 UCLA 0.658060
8 So. California 0.616111
9 LSU 0.601589
10 Oregon 0.595866
11 Ole Miss 0.578316
12 Alabama 0.576445
13 N Carolina 0.549871
14 Utah 0.515358
15 N Carolina St. 0.509958
16 Notre Dame 0.480871
17 Tulane 0.480829
18 Coastal Car. 0.470591
19 Troy 0.439997
20 Penn St. 0.436338
21 Liberty 0.427705
22 C. Florida 0.419784
23 Illinois 0.417997
24 Texas 0.409548
25 Kansas St. 0.380738
26 Syracuse 0.370069
27 Florida St. 0.360041
28 Kansas 0.352311
29 Tex. San Antonio 0.347567
30 Mississippi St. 0.346238
31 Oregon St. 0.331424
32 Oklahoma St. 0.321472
33 Kentucky 0.319748
34 Washington 0.304192
35 S Alabama 0.287351
36 Maryland 0.279231
37 Baylor 0.276317
38 East Carolina 0.269464
39 Cincinnati 0.268183
40 Wake Forest 0.250806
41 Louisville 0.233815
42 S Carolina 0.204238
43 Oklahoma 0.201449
44 So. Methodist 0.191849
45 Purdue 0.180391
46 BYU 0.163842
47 Arkansas 0.154534
48 Boise St. 0.151717
49 Houston 0.145504
50 Wisconsin 0.137955
51 San Jose St. 0.136174
52 Florida 0.134283
53 Minnesota 0.132055
54 Washington St. 0.129510
55 Wyoming 0.116115
56 Iowa 0.093970
57 Duke 0.082470
58 Air Force 0.077496
59 Ohio 0.076198
60 Pittsburgh 0.075906
61 N Texas 0.073151
62 Michigan St. 0.064351
63 James Madison 0.050109
64 Texas Tech 0.039360
65 Toledo 0.038383
66 Iowa St. 0.033113
67 Georgia So. 0.019770
68 Fresno St. 0.013255
69 Appalachian St. 0.012386
70 W. Kentucky 0.004239
71 Buffalo -0.001170
72 Bowling Green -0.018712
73 Memphis -0.022196
74 So. Mississippi -0.022831
75 Missouri -0.054482
76 Georgia Tech -0.054545
77 Auburn -0.060845
78 San Diego St. -0.078736
79 Marshall -0.080582
80 Stanford -0.083404
81 Texas A&M -0.123609
82 Fla. Atlantic -0.133943
83 Utah St. -0.135823
84 Connecticut -0.136736
85 Ala. Birmingham -0.140253
86 Georgia St. -0.147498
87 Rice -0.165049
88 Virginia -0.166493
89 UNLV -0.178683
90 La. Lafayette -0.182237
91 Indiana -0.183672
92 U. Miami -0.204372
93 Arizona -0.209599
94 West Virginia -0.214166
95 Rutgers -0.219998
96 Vanderbilt -0.220510
97 Army -0.223520
98 Arizona St. -0.223810
99 Ball St. -0.230906
100 E. Michigan -0.232769
101 Navy -0.239176
102 Middle Ten. -0.247616
103 Tulsa -0.273762
104 W. Michigan -0.299744
105 Miami U. -0.308368
106 La. Tech -0.313220
107 Cal (Berkeley) -0.324045
108 Kent St. -0.336597
109 C. Michigan -0.344097
110 Old Dominion -0.344630
111 Nebraska -0.381625
112 Texas St. -0.406155
113 Florida Int’l -0.425601
114 UTEP -0.426541
115 La. Monroe -0.453222
116 Colorado St. -0.455590
117 Arkansas St. -0.456299
118 Boston Coll. -0.506176
119 Colorado -0.511677
120 New Mexico St. -0.526277
121 New Mexico -0.557598
122 Virginia Tech -0.566164
123 Northwestern -0.593769
124 Charlotte -0.599033
125 No. Illinois -0.602248
126 Temple -0.606828
127 S Florida -0.631843
128 Akron -0.703684
129 Nevada (Reno) -0.736124
130 Hawaii -0.794625
131 Massachusetts -0.831767

11/06/2022 Conferences

1 SEC 0.296427
2 Big XII 0.263285
3 Pac-12 0.149832
4 Big Ten 0.146128
5 ACC 0.118245
6 AAC 0.000164
7 Sun Belt -0.058089
8 Indpendents -0.092269
9 CUSA -0.184209
10 MWC -0.203535
11 MAC -0.246976

10/30/2022

1 Ohio St. 0.794584
2 TCU 0.787664
3 Tennessee 0.778340
4 Clemson 0.756694
5 Georgia 0.745112
6 Michigan 0.706152
7 Alabama 0.619672
8 Ole Miss 0.592286
9 So. California 0.562746
10 UCLA 0.556930
11 Oregon 0.553443
12 Illinois 0.488098
13 Tulane 0.477047
14 N Carolina 0.474083
15 Kansas St. 0.468379
16 Utah 0.454556
17 LSU 0.444233
18 Syracuse 0.436228
19 Oregon St. 0.385641
20 Coastal Car. 0.385597
21 N Carolina St. 0.382928
22 Troy 0.365012
23 Penn St. 0.363646
24 Oklahoma St. 0.361558
25 Maryland 0.350980
26 Liberty 0.339543
27 Notre Dame 0.313082
28 Wake Forest 0.306522
29 Mississippi St. 0.304005
30 Tex. San Antonio 0.294341
31 C. Florida 0.286959
32 East Carolina 0.276133
33 Texas 0.265509
34 Florida St. 0.258279
35 Oklahoma 0.255622
36 Purdue 0.254504
37 Houston 0.227531
38 Boise St. 0.225486
39 Arkansas 0.219218
40 Kentucky 0.219124
41 Kansas 0.208062
42 Washington 0.192453
43 Cincinnati 0.186540
44 S Carolina 0.163564
45 Baylor 0.154357
46 So. Mississippi 0.152877
47 James Madison 0.136961
48 S Alabama 0.136706
49 Louisville 0.134815
50 Wyoming 0.111626
51 San Jose St. 0.105826
52 So. Methodist 0.090922
53 Texas Tech 0.088699
54 Georgia So. 0.083367
55 Appalachian St. 0.081988
56 Florida 0.076897
57 Minnesota 0.076513
58 Washington St. 0.071986
59 Buffalo 0.068442
60 Air Force 0.050125
61 Memphis 0.041669
62 Duke 0.034164
63 Wisconsin 0.033090
64 BYU 0.023204
65 Toledo 0.016436
66 N Texas 0.013221
67 Auburn 0.006365
68 W. Kentucky 0.002956
69 Missouri -0.007620
70 Stanford -0.019823
71 Fresno St. -0.023702
72 Texas A&M -0.024714
73 Iowa -0.026815
74 Ohio -0.047847
75 Iowa St. -0.059712
76 Ala. Birmingham -0.066245
77 Middle Ten. -0.072914
78 Pittsburgh -0.077538
79 U. Miami -0.092239
80 Michigan St. -0.095209
81 Indiana -0.098156
82 UNLV -0.101637
83 Georgia Tech -0.104621
84 Bowling Green -0.111287
85 Virginia -0.115605
86 Marshall -0.124366
87 San Diego St. -0.140877
88 Vanderbilt -0.142189
89 Fla. Atlantic -0.143718
90 Connecticut -0.150354
91 West Virginia -0.156728
92 Utah St. -0.157814
93 Rutgers -0.158713
94 Army -0.163974
95 Navy -0.170189
96 Arizona St. -0.172156
97 Arizona -0.172874
98 Georgia St. -0.173334
99 Rice -0.199016
100 Florida Int’l -0.211882
101 Tulsa -0.222357
102 La. Lafayette -0.230863
103 E. Michigan -0.240021
104 Texas St. -0.245589
105 Ball St. -0.261292
106 Kent St. -0.276003
107 Old Dominion -0.277114
108 W. Michigan -0.279575
109 Nebraska -0.284164
110 Cal (Berkeley) -0.286634
111 Miami U. -0.306476
112 Colorado St. -0.377507
113 UTEP -0.379672
114 La. Tech -0.393693
115 C. Michigan -0.407585
116 S Florida -0.417184
117 Colorado -0.435794
118 Boston Coll. -0.440608
119 Virginia Tech -0.442336
120 Arkansas St. -0.453800
121 New Mexico -0.455141
122 No. Illinois -0.460574
123 La. Monroe -0.490141
124 UNC-Charlotte -0.494027
125 New Mexico St. -0.508675
126 Northwestern -0.566642
127 Temple -0.573426
128 Hawaii -0.691412
129 Nevada (Reno) -0.737767
130 Massachusetts -0.738830
131 Akron -0.827597

10/30/2022 Conferences

1 SEC 0.285307
2 Big XII 0.237341
3 Pac-12 0.140873
4 Big Ten 0.131276
5 ACC 0.107912
6 AAC 0.018513
7 Sun Belt -0.046622
8 Indpendents -0.126572
9 CUSA -0.150059
10 MWC -0.182733
11 MAC -0.261115

10/23/2022

1 Clemson 0.818146
2 TCU 0.708073
3 Tennessee 0.664842
4 Georgia 0.662319
5 Alabama 0.625595
6 Ohio St. 0.616511
7 Michigan 0.603979
8 Ole Miss 0.557276
9 Oregon 0.533639
10 So. California 0.494716
11 UCLA 0.489522
12 LSU 0.487966
13 Syracuse 0.480954
14 Tulane 0.443720
15 Illinois 0.428852
16 Penn St. 0.407179
17 Troy 0.401930
18 Oklahoma St. 0.395127
19 Oregon St. 0.387851
20 Wake Forest 0.375602
21 Liberty 0.371245
22 Utah 0.349682
23 N Carolina St. 0.341563
24 N Carolina 0.337149
25 Maryland 0.325554
26 Kansas St. 0.314606
27 Mississippi St. 0.313682
28 Coastal Car. 0.295927
29 Texas 0.281451
30 Kentucky 0.271659
31 Tex. San Antonio 0.262371
32 S Carolina 0.235772
33 Purdue 0.226554
34 Houston 0.218548
35 Cincinnati 0.212624
36 Kansas 0.207891
37 Florida St. 0.202903
38 Notre Dame 0.178383
39 Oklahoma 0.176385
40 Texas Tech 0.161296
41 Arkansas 0.158664
42 Washington 0.155499
43 Boise St. 0.154320
44 James Madison 0.144852
45 Washington St. 0.143329
46 C. Florida 0.135763
47 East Carolina 0.133439
48 S Alabama 0.121962
49 Florida 0.099540
50 Wyoming 0.086951
51 Georgia So. 0.080622
52 W. Kentucky 0.078115
53 Appalachian St. 0.070349
54 Baylor 0.066250
55 BYU 0.061452
56 So. Mississippi 0.058670
57 Auburn 0.046737
58 San Jose St. 0.043395
59 Wisconsin 0.042484
60 Marshall 0.036644
61 Ala. Birmingham 0.035841
62 Duke 0.035435
63 Air Force 0.023604
64 Buffalo 0.013480
65 Louisville 0.009265
66 Minnesota 0.006491
67 Memphis 0.004194
68 Texas A&M -0.003793
69 Pittsburgh -0.009893
70 Iowa St. -0.012929
71 Stanford -0.015233
72 Virginia -0.016708
73 Georgia Tech -0.027745
74 So. Methodist -0.034981
75 Ohio -0.039325
76 Iowa -0.040193
77 San Diego St. -0.048485
78 Rice -0.053332
79 Toledo -0.055221
80 Michigan St. -0.065164
81 Indiana -0.073672
82 Missouri -0.087063
83 Rutgers -0.091867
84 Arizona -0.108219
85 Bowling Green -0.113066
86 West Virginia -0.115661
87 UNLV -0.116576
88 Middle Ten. -0.125988
89 Fresno St. -0.128077
90 N Texas -0.128987
91 La. Lafayette -0.130211
92 Vanderbilt -0.151234
93 Utah St. -0.175431
94 U. Miami -0.175690
95 Old Dominion -0.177722
96 E. Michigan -0.184616
97 Tulsa -0.187296
98 Army -0.198268
99 Arizona St. -0.206919
100 Connecticut -0.217007
101 Navy -0.219959
102 Nebraska -0.236604
103 Cal (Berkeley) -0.241982
104 Texas St. -0.262824
105 Fla. Atlantic -0.269242
106 La. Tech -0.279223
107 Florida Int’l -0.284677
108 W. Michigan -0.290178
109 Ball St. -0.295605
110 Georgia St. -0.300620
111 UTEP -0.302327
112 Colorado -0.305555
113 Kent St. -0.309666
114 Colorado St. -0.324134
115 Miami U. -0.331309
116 Boston Coll. -0.339210
117 Arkansas St. -0.377362
118 S Florida -0.378787
119 Virginia Tech -0.395842
120 C. Michigan -0.404578
121 Temple -0.452837
122 No. Illinois -0.455459
123 La. Monroe -0.456217
124 Northwestern -0.477106
125 New Mexico -0.515395
126 New Mexico St. -0.558076
127 Massachusetts -0.569305
128 Hawaii -0.601601
129 UNC-Charlotte -0.655915
130 Nevada (Reno) -0.665317
131 Akron -0.683369

10/23/2022 Conferences

1 SEC 0.276984
2 Big XII 0.218249
3 Pac-12 0.139694
4 Big Ten 0.119500
5 ACC 0.116852
6 AAC -0.011416
7 Sun Belt -0.035286
8 Indpendents -0.133681
9 CUSA -0.159576
10 MWC -0.188330
11 MAC -0.262409

10/16/2022

1 Clemson 0.669204
2 Tennessee 0.633229
3 Michigan 0.623244
4 Georgia 0.621459
5 Ole Miss 0.606535
6 TCU 0.572979
7 Alabama 0.542778
8 UCLA 0.531846
9 Ohio St. 0.523750
10 Syracuse 0.496285
11 So. California 0.449313
12 Illinois 0.407252
13 Mississippi St. 0.366125
14 Utah 0.346661
15 Purdue 0.344501
16 N Carolina 0.336761
17 Penn St. 0.333917
18 Texas 0.319410
19 LSU 0.312338
20 Tulane 0.312253
21 Oregon 0.308621
22 Oregon St. 0.305081
23 Maryland 0.305081
24 N Carolina St. 0.302859
25 Kansas St. 0.300091
26 Wake Forest 0.294587
27 Kentucky 0.290534
28 Kansas 0.290416
29 Liberty 0.259394
30 Coastal Car. 0.247410
31 C. Florida 0.226126
32 Oklahoma St. 0.224483
33 James Madison 0.212116
34 Troy 0.200273
35 Oklahoma 0.191180
36 S Alabama 0.176057
37 Arkansas 0.167909
38 Florida St. 0.165154
39 S Carolina 0.157172
40 Air Force 0.133401
41 Cincinnati 0.132509
42 Houston 0.116619
43 Tex. San Antonio 0.107788
44 Washington St. 0.104491
45 Georgia Tech 0.099997
46 Texas Tech 0.094309
47 BYU 0.084869
48 So. Methodist 0.081140
49 Pittsburgh 0.078617
50 Memphis 0.073815
51 Ala. Birmingham 0.070487
52 Washington 0.070176
53 Florida 0.065093
54 Minnesota 0.060869
55 East Carolina 0.056817
56 Texas A&M 0.053394
57 Georgia So. 0.046977
58 Auburn 0.027255
59 Boise St. 0.021378
60 Appalachian St. 0.018604
61 Iowa 0.003148
62 Notre Dame 0.000333
63 Indiana -0.000007
64 Wyoming -0.002868
65 Iowa St. -0.010037
66 Toledo -0.014764
67 San Jose St. -0.017677
68 So. Mississippi -0.021526
69 Duke -0.026819
70 W. Kentucky -0.029781
71 UNLV -0.031259
72 N Texas -0.031895
73 West Virginia -0.032509
74 Baylor -0.033038
75 Vanderbilt -0.042181
76 Utah St. -0.067620
77 Wisconsin -0.082077
78 Louisville -0.084532
79 Stanford -0.084975
80 Virginia -0.088288
81 Rice -0.095894
82 Michigan St. -0.096168
83 Old Dominion -0.103386
84 U. Miami -0.110247
85 Buffalo -0.110395
86 Arizona -0.110434
87 San Diego St. -0.113215
88 Marshall -0.118253
89 Ohio -0.124620
90 Missouri -0.145768
91 Middle Ten. -0.146211
92 Rutgers -0.146411
93 Fla. Atlantic -0.147063
94 Cal (Berkeley) -0.154005
95 Navy -0.164939
96 Nebraska -0.184982
97 Texas St. -0.186352
98 Fresno St. -0.186891
99 Tulsa -0.194664
100 Arizona St. -0.196021
101 Bowling Green -0.202626
102 La. Lafayette -0.203403
103 La. Tech -0.215184
104 Connecticut -0.230539
105 Miami U. -0.233015
106 Army -0.233427
107 Colorado -0.235683
108 Ball St. -0.242322
109 E. Michigan -0.248448
110 Arkansas St. -0.271946
111 La. Monroe -0.272389
112 Georgia St. -0.278763
113 Boston Coll. -0.298019
114 Kent St. -0.310751
115 C. Michigan -0.322169
116 Temple -0.324662
117 Florida Int’l -0.326191
118 Virginia Tech -0.338757
119 UTEP -0.344917
120 Colorado St. -0.345914
121 No. Illinois -0.381096
122 Northwestern -0.386294
123 W. Michigan -0.408235
124 New Mexico -0.421840
125 S Florida -0.423737
126 UNC-Charlotte -0.459450
127 Hawaii -0.470617
128 Akron -0.573192
129 New Mexico St. -0.579226
130 Nevada (Reno) -0.628390
131 Massachusetts -0.671463

10/09/2022

1 Clemson 0.583051
2 Georgia 0.566898
3 Alabama 0.557534
4 Ohio St. 0.552117
5 Ole Miss 0.501758
6 UCLA 0.447233
7 Tennessee 0.440778
8 Southern Calif. 0.436596
9 Michigan 0.435572
10 Mississippi St. 0.422263
11 TCU 0.380894
12 N. Carolina St. 0.354225
13 Kansas 0.351827
14 Oregon 0.340345
15 Penn St. 0.336286
16 Syracuse 0.333930
17 Wake Forest 0.317381
18 James Madison 0.316852
19 Illinois 0.315340
20 Coastal Car. 0.308708
21 Kansas St. 0.302726
22 Tulane 0.270421
23 Oklahoma St. 0.247288
24 LSU 0.245369
25 Notre Dame 0.239431
26 North Carolina 0.233772
27 Purdue 0.212973
28 Washington St. 0.207135
29 San Jose St. 0.199397
30 Texas 0.198857
31 Liberty 0.196614
32 Florida St. 0.195379
33 Utah 0.183372
34 BYU 0.180587
35 Memphis 0.169555
36 Houston 0.168568
37 Maryland 0.149961
38 Cincinnati 0.143174
39 C. Florida 0.131821
40 Kentucky 0.129359
41 South Carolina 0.125012
42 Troy 0.112309
43 Auburn 0.105417
44 Oregon St. 0.102072
45 Georgia Tech 0.100776
46 Cal (Berkeley) 0.097984
47 Florida 0.092914
48 S. Alabama 0.084881
49 Texas Tech 0.075277
50 UNLV 0.072386
51 TX San Anton’ 0.070511
52 Arkansas 0.066629
53 Baylor 0.065417
54 Iowa St. 0.061866
55 Pittsburgh 0.059447
56 Minnesota 0.045162
57 Oklahoma 0.045060
58 Duke 0.044557
59 Alabama B’ham 0.042612
60 App. St. 0.039801
61 Wyoming 0.035192
62 Air Force 0.031132
63 Indiana 0.022771
64 East Carolina 0.019721
65 Iowa 0.016225
66 Texas A&M 0.012770
67 Marshall -0.008955
68 Rice -0.022927
69 S. Methodist -0.031057
70 Wisconsin -0.033798
71 Arizona -0.037166
72 Boise St. -0.038652
73 Vanderbilt -0.055178
74 Washington -0.057972
75 Virginia -0.063536
76 Middle Ten. -0.079340
77 Texas St. -0.080489
78 Utah St. -0.085188
79 Buffalo -0.087687
80 Navy -0.088053
81 Louisville -0.096469
82 Ga. Southern -0.101803
83 West Virginia -0.102467
84 Southern MS -0.105996
85 Missouri -0.114163
86 Rutgers -0.129746
87 W. Kentucky -0.130009
88 Toledo -0.132222
89 North Texas -0.134194
90 Miami U. -0.137542
91 La. Tech -0.140237
92 E. Michigan -0.147111
93 San Diego St. -0.150818
94 U. Miami -0.154688
95 Ohio -0.157409
96 Nebraska -0.164726
97 Arkansas St. -0.185711
98 Tulsa -0.201419
99 Connecticut -0.201826
100 La. Lafayette -0.201996
101 New Mexico -0.207673
102 Stanford -0.209402
103 Temple -0.210107
104 Arizona St. -0.211136
105 Michigan St. -0.216904
106 Bowling Green -0.217077
107 La. Monroe -0.220260
108 Kent St. -0.225590
109 Old Dominion -0.226742
110 Colorado St. -0.227588
111 Army -0.241138
112 Fla. Atlantic -0.247303
113 Florida Int’l -0.251173
114 Boston College -0.274606
115 Fresno St. -0.276870
116 Ball St. -0.288515
117 W. Michigan -0.288694
118 Georgia St. -0.308265
119 UTEP -0.313446
120 Virginia Tech -0.320024
121 Colorado -0.340131
122 South Florida -0.352298
123 Nevada (Reno) -0.375297
124 Northwestern -0.396350
125 Akron -0.414878
126 C. Michigan -0.436504
127 UNC-Charlotte -0.459068
128 N. Illinois -0.477944
129 Massachusetts -0.520425
130 Hawaii -0.552848
131 New Mex. St. -0.666304

Preseason/Week 0 Top 25 2023

In Bowls, College Football, College Football Playoff, Rankings, Rankings Commentary, Rivalry on September 1, 2023 at 9:00 AM

I know Georgia is the defending champion,  but I need more continuity if I’m going to consider them the #1 team going into next season. Amost everyone knows the quarterback will be different, but the offensive coordinator is gone and so are most of the targets and running backs.  They might gel by the end of the season, but I think preseason rankings shouldn’t just be guesses as to which programs have been good enough in recent years to probably finish near the top.

Georgia and Ohio St. were arguably the two best teams last season and provided the historic moment above, where the deciding kick in the semifinal was kicked by Ohio St.’s Noah Ruggles in 2022 and landed in 2023. If you have amnesia, it missed and Georgia won, 42-41, before defeating TCU in a blowout for the national championship.

Ryan Day is still at Ohio St. though.  The Buckeyes will also have a new quarterback, but I trust Day to have whoever it is ready right away more than I trust (old and) new Georgia OC Mike Bobo.  Day might even have backups who can win Heismans at other schools.  I also think the Buckeyes have better continuity in the roster.  I hope for their sake they have a kicker who’s a little better from 50 yards, but that’s what separated them from a relatively easy pick to stay #1 going into the season.

I’ll stay in the Big Ten for #3 Michigan.  It’s a weird situation where the Wolverines were top five the last two seasons and Alabama was not.

Michigan’s resurgence is mostly based on defense, and the good thing about that is it’s not centered around one player.  They seem to be solid everywhere but linebacker.

On offense, Big Blue does have a returning QB and players to block for him, so expect another quality game against the Buckeyes.  I have been a little less impressed with Michigan’s consistency though, so this is why I couldn’t justify putting them higher.

While I’m pretty confident the winner of Michigan and Ohio St. will be the team to beat in the Big Ten (no offense to Penn St., who has a habit of being really good one year but mediocre the next) if not the entirety of college football, I don’t feel the same way about the SEC.  Of course I’d be surprised if anyone other than Georgia won the East, but I don’t have a strong feeling about the West.  

LSU certainly has the talent to do so.  Somehow the Tigers managed to pull it off last year even though Brian Kelly basically took over a JV team that was embarrassed in the bowl in January 2022.  I don’t think LSU was actually the better team overall last season though.  They were the day of the Alabama game, but they definitely were not in the first week  against Florida St. or the last (regularly-scheduled) week against Texas A&M.  

I don’t think this was the actual play, but Alabama LB Henry To’o To’o was not able to contain QB Jayden Daniels in Baton Rouge last season. Daniels scored in overtime in this fashion before completing a pass to Mason Taylor to the same corner of the field for the two-point conversion in the 32-31 LSU win.

Like the change of fortune I expect for Ohio St. and Georgia, my instinct is to reverse the order here and give the nod to the Tide.  I am skeptical this will be the first time that there will be back-to-back failures by Alabama to either win the SEC West or the national championship under Saban or the first back-to-back divisional wins by LSU ever.  LSU also hasn’t won three of five against Alabama since 2007-2011.  

I think Kelly has things headed in the right direction, but I still think there will be growing pains before the Tigers are in a playoff position.  Of course I hope I’m wrong.  

I’m not saying that the playoff will be only two conferences, but I think these will at least be the best 4 teams before the Ohio St.-Michigan game (and including LSU, the best 5 before the LSU-Bama game).  I don’t feel strongly about any candidate outside of those two conferences.  There are several teams that could be this year’s TCU (maybe not as big of a surprise, but someone from outside the SEC and Big Ten whose record is too good to pass up), but it’s hard to be confident in any one of them.

A lot of people have USC as the top team outside of those two conferences, but I think the main reason (other than hype) the Trojans were so high at points last season was the overall lack of competition.  I recognize they lost to Tulane in flukey circumstances, but it was about time for someone other than Utah to expose their weaknesses.  I don’t see USC beating any of the five teams I’ve mentioned.  

One that I could see as more likely to win the necessary big games to make a Playoff is Clemson.   If another one-point game had gone differently, they probably would have done so last season.  

On offense, all the skill players should be improved, and it seems the OC position will be upgraded.  Broyles Award winner Garrett Riley of the aforementioned Horned Frogs takes over that job.  There may be some issues with depth, but the Tigers also have a talented defense.  It might not be enough to contain a playoff offense, but it may be enough to get them there.  Most playoff games are won by the more efficient offense anyway.

The USC defense has a lot to prove, but I apply a similar analysis to the Trojans.  If things go well, it may be hard to turn them down for a Playoff spot.  I think Dabo has shown more ability to do something once there than Lincoln Riley has.  Like with Brian Kelly, I’m a little skeptical that all of the cultural problems will be gone in Riley’s second season.

Clemson RB Phil Mafah did not get around the end (Jordan Burch, in this case) quite as easily against South Carolina in Clemson last season. In hindsight, this game is probably what kept the Tigers from a playoff position. South Carolina won, 31-30, ending a 7-game losing streak in the series.

So I think those are the main Playoff contenders at the moment. 

I did want to note that Washington will probably be lower on the list than they are in some other places since they had a major injury to Cam Davis, who would probably have been the star running back in the Pac-12.

Speaking of the Pac-12, Utah is another team to watch, but my concern would be they peaked last year and may not have the staying power of my top 7.  

I think it makes some sense in preseason to give the benefit of the doubt to programs that have been the most successful of late, but I don’t agree with treating teams that way just for being good last year.

There could be a team out of left field again that makes or at least competes for a playoff spot, but I’m not going to go into detail about any of the others on the list below.  It’s just going to be snap judgments based on last year’s results and known quantities who are returning.  

Ole Miss (who entered the bowls at #26) ended up being the worst team on my list going into the bowls last season that did not win its bowl game, so that gives you an idea of how seriously I tend to take predictions of miraculous transformations from December of one year to September of the next.

Pitt and Texas Tech were too far out to make the final top 25 last season (see below) despite quality bowl wins, but they were impressive enough and seem to have enough coming back to make the top 25 now. The only teams I dropped out to make room for them and Ole Miss were the Group of 5 teams who all happened to start with T. Boise St. seemed most likely to maintain its success, so I did leave the Broncos in.

I did complete my top 25 before the Florida/Utah game, but I didn’t want to just rush out a low-quality blog.  I didn’t complete it before Notre Dame/Navy or USC/San Jose St., but those did not affect my rankings.  I didn’t consider Florida because they didn’t finish in the top 50 of my last ratings anyway.  That was my cutoff to be considered.

I never did a final top 25 for last year, but you can figure out what it was below. The teams I had as #26 to #31 and #33 to #35 going into the bowls all lost their bowl games, so there weren’t any changes to the teams that made up the top 25 after the bowls, just the order.

RankTeamLast
1 Ohio St. 2
2 Georgia 1
3 Michigan 3
4 Alabama 6
5 LSU 10
6 Clemson 8
7 Southern CA 11
8 Penn St. 7
9 Utah 13
10 Texas 18
11 Florida St. 19
12 Tennessee 5
13 Notre Dame 22
14 Ole Miss
15 Oregon 14
16 UCLA 25
17 TCU 4
18 Kansas St. 12
19 S Carolina 24
20 Oregon St. 16
21 Washington 17
22 Boise St. 21
23 Mississippi St. 23
24 Pittsburgh
25 Texas Tech

Out of Top 25: (9) Tulane, (15) Troy, (20) TX San Antonio

Brian Kelly Timeline and New Rankings

In Bowls, College Football, College Football Playoff, General LSU, Rankings, Rankings Commentary on December 5, 2021 at 3:10 PM

Brian Kelly Timeline

In the last blog, I decided not to speculate on some aspects of how the deal that brought Kelly to LSU materialized (through his agent) when and how it did.  I’m glad that I didn’t because more information has come out.  It’s not completely different from what I thought, but the picture is more complete now. 

Brian Kelly made an interesting comment to Rece Davis in an interview on GameDay.   He said that his agent Trace Armstrong told him about several inquiries that he had received; but he only discussed this at the end of the season.  Unless his agent called his wife and cleared it with her first, I don’t think he meant the very end of the season.  I suspect that he wasn’t so overwhelmed with the stress of Notre Dame’s looming game against 3-8 Stanford that he took a little bit of time to have conversations with his agent and his family during the week prior to that game.  It is plausible that the only direct conversation with Woodward was after the Stanford game though, and it makes sense that everything had to become settled relatively quickly.  My conclusion about Kelly having some prior conversations is also supported by LSU grad Booger McFarland, who said the deal with Kelly (or at least the formal offer) was already on the verge of being finalized on Saturday.

Rece Davis interviewed Brian Kelly in a meeting room on the LSU campus. The interview aired on GameDay yesterday.

I think Armstrong knew Kelly and Woodward were keeping quiet, so he had the opportunity to fill the void by suggesting the job was actually going to Riley.  Riley was probably going to USC at that point anyway, but Armstrong was able to get a more favorable contract approved more quickly than he would have otherwise.  It didn’t hurt Kelly that he was able to stay under the radar as long as he did.  Whether Riley’s name floating around helped Woodward to secure the funding I’m not sure.  Some have speculated that Woodward knew a long time ago, perhaps before even taking the job or at least before the Orgeron announcement, the money was going to be in place.

I imagine someone at LSU other than Scott Woodward had to be apprised of the situation to finalize the deal even though Woodward was given broad latitude.  At that point a leak was inevitable.  Any major news about LSU football gets all over town very quickly.  I’m not saying the leak was out of malice.  It might have just been to calm down some of the hysteria regarding Riley going to another team.  Some worried that Riley was the guy Woodward was counting on all this time and that he didn’t have a backup plan.

There was an article by former LSU beat writer Ross Dellenger, who now works for Sports Illustrated.  It says that Woodward made one last phone call to Jimbo Fisher prior to the weekend before proceeding with hiring Kelly.  I hope that isn’t true; but if it is, I’m glad Jimbo said no.  I know Woodward likes to hire champions, but Fisher left Florida St. as it was going down the tubes in the years after his national title there.  I certainly think his is an improvement over the previous coaching staff in College Station, but you don’t pay someone a salary like that to go 8-4.  I’m not certain Kelly will do better, but I’d rather have the uncertainty than the knowledge of what Jimbo has done in recent years.  If he were available, I think it would have cost a lot more than the Kelly deal did anyway.

Ratings and Playoff Commentary

I mentioned last week that Alabama did not schedule well out of conference; but the Tide played 6 games against SEC West opponents, all of whom were bowl-eligible and which included #9 Ole Miss, as well as otherwise-undefeated Georgia and 7-5 Tennessee. 

I explained last week that Oklahoma St. had a very good schedule, and it was even better than Alabama’s.  This is why the Cowboys are ranked higher than Notre Dame despite the additional loss.  To illustrate this point, Virginia and West Virginia are both 6-6 with almost identical strengths of schedule.  Notre Dame beat Virginia, while Oklahoma St. beat West Virginia.  Notre Dame only beat two teams that were better: Purdue and Wisconsin.  Oklahoma St. beat four teams that were better: Boise St., Kansas St., Baylor, and Oklahoma.  Both teams won 2/3 of their games against better teams, but being tested more often should give Oklahoma St. the edge. Even if we expand it to the top 80 (we are still talking about risky opponents here—#76 TCU beat Baylor, #77 Illinois beat two ranked teams on the road, and #70 Florida was a field goal away from beating Alabama), Oklahoma St. still played almost twice as many in that range.

Baylor does belong lower than Notre Dame though.  Although BYU was a good non-conference opponent, the Bears scheduled Texas St. (who went 4-8 and is my #111) and Texas Southern (who only beat two other FCS opponents).  Although they essentially played the game conference schedule as Oklahoma St. did, losing to bad teams is punished a little more harshly.  As mentioned, TCU is #76.  Iowa St., who beat Oklahoma St., is #49. 

All three are relatively close though.  There is more than twice as much separation between #4 Cincinnati and #5 Oklahoma St. than there is between #5 Oklahoma St. and #7 Baylor.  There is just under twice as much space between #7 Baylor and #8 Ohio St.

There is a consensus about who the four semifinal teams should be and since the focus of my ratings is creating a fair objective top four, I could not be more satisfied.  You can quibble about how high UL-Lafayette and UT-San Antonio are—I think teams like Michigan St., Oklahoma, and Utah would beat both easily—but I don’t mind giving credit to successful seasons.  Even with an expanded playoff, I wouldn’t want teams with more than one or two losses this season in it, so I don’t mind if 1-loss ULL or 1-loss UTSA are higher than teams who would be highly favored to beat them.

I also think if Cincinnati played number 5 through 10 they’d be lucky to win one or two.  On the other hand, the Bearcats are 1-0 against that group; and a lot of people would have told you out of 10 tries Oregon would beat Utah 9 or 10 of them.  If you missed it, the Ducks had two shots at the Utes and fell far short both times.  Anyway, I also don’t think a two-loss non-champion would be more deserving of a slot in the top 4 even if they look better to me.  Oklahoma St. and others had their chances and fell short. About a foot short in the case of Oklahoma St. against Baylor.  The best Cowboy teams always lose to Iowa St. though. This also happened 10 years ago when the Cowboys missed the top two in favor of the Tide.

Houston stayed close with Cincinnati for a while, so I don’t love the fact that they fell out of the top 25; but Utah St. deserved to move back into it after their solid win over San Diego St. for the Mountain West title.  I like seeing some stability as far as which teams are in the top 25.  In the last three weeks, only four teams have fallen out.  Utah St. was one of those four, so there are only three different teams than there were three weeks ago. 

Championship losers San Diego St., Appalachian St., and Wake Forest all managed to stay in the top 25.  There needs to be a penalty for losing; but just like I’m glad Oklahoma St. didn’t fall out of the top 5 in favor of Notre Dame, I like that it’s not so harsh that any of the three fell below enough idle teams to fall out of the top 25.  

Alabama QB Bryce Young drops back to pass in the SEC Championship Game against Georgia in Atlanta on Saturday. Alabama is now the consensus Number 1 team going into the bowls. The Tide will play Cincinnati in the Cotton Bowl on December 31.

I wrote everything above last night, but I just wanted to respond briefly to Michigan being placed ahead of Georgia.  It doesn’t really matter who #2 and #3 are, but it’s the only difference between the respective top fours, so I wanted to address it.

Georgia Tech isn’t even in that top 80 group I was talking about, but the Bulldogs are in luck because that’s the third-best team they scheduled out of conference.  I have Clemson just outside of the top 25 and UAB at #50.  Of course they avoided Alabama and Ole Miss in the regular season. Imagine the arguments if they had played Alabama.  Anyway, Arkansas and Auburn as the non-divisional games still aren’t bad.  Michigan’s Big Ten schedule did include some bad teams though.  Rutgers, Nebraska, Northwestern, and Indiana all have losing records compared to just one in-conference opponent for Georgia that had a losing record.  Michigan’s one Power Five opponent rates worse than Georgia Tech.  MAC champion Northern Illinois was a help and Western Michigan rated similarly to UAB, but it should not be enough to put them ahead.

That said, if the committee made the decision based on the team that will take the field at the end of the month being harder to beat rather than resume, I do agree with Michigan being ahead.  They finished very strong.  If they play the way they played against Ohio St. and Iowa, they can beat anyone.  If Georgia plays the way they played against Alabama, especially with the turnovers, they won’t have much of a chance.

Top 25

Rank Team Last
1 Alabama 3
2 Georgia 1
3 Michigan 4
4 Cincinnati 5
5 Oklahoma St. 2
6 Notre Dame 6
7 Baylor 9
8 Ohio St. 7
9 Ole Miss 8
10 B. Young 11
11 UL-Lafayette 16
12 Michigan St. 13
13 Oklahoma 15
14 TX-San Anton’ 20
15 Pittsburgh 21
16 Utah 22
17 Wisconsin 18
18 Iowa 10
19 San Diego St. 12
20 Oregon 14
21 Boise St. 24
22 App. State 17
23 Arkansas 25
24 Utah St.
25 Wake Forest 19
     

Out of Rankings: (23) Houston

1-130 computer ratings

2021 Week 12 Top 25

In College Football, Rankings, Rankings Commentary on November 22, 2021 at 6:45 PM

I tried to change something at the last minute last week, and that messed things up for this week.  I don’t like when there are dramatic shifts from one week to the next.  According to the original top 25 last week, I created some unnecessary changes and then in a few cases there were dramatic changes back this week.  I shouldn’t have tried to intervene and temporarily alter my formula last week, so I took the unusual step of changing the rankings for last week.

Redoing the previous final rankings is why I couldn’t get this out sooner, but it’s here now.

Michigan did not lose last week, but the Wolverines got relatively few points for beating Maryland.  This allowed other teams to pass them up.

Oklahoma St. beat Texas Tech, which is a good but not great opponent.  I think it was more helpful that Baylor has now won five of six since losing to the Cowboys and that Boise St. has won four games in a row. 

Also, Cincinnati is still feeling a negative effect from their games against Indiana, Notre Dame, and Navy.  Although when the Bearcats play East Carolina next week, the Navy/East Carolina game won’t really matter, for now it hurts Cincinnati that the Pirates won.  Notre Dame didn’t slip enough in points to fall a spot (especially without Michigan gaining very much), but their value as a win went down and will go down again.  Indiana still only has a single win against an FBS opponent.

Although Alabama beat a decent team in Arkansas, many SEC teams took a hit to their respective strengths of schedule this past week, so the win was not quite enough to put the Tide ahead of the Bearcats.  Auburn is slightly better than East Carolina, so I do expect the Tide to move up with a win.

C.J. Stroud threw for 6 touchdowns (all in the first half) and 432 yards with and only 3 incompletions in 35 attempts for the game. Three different receivers had over 100 receiving yards. Ohio St. also had over 200 rushing yards.

Ohio St. shot up in many rankings because of their margin of victory over Michigan St., but as much as that helped, don’t forget that they lost to Oregon.  So it hurt the Buckeyes in my rankings that the Ducks lost.  It will probably help the playoff ranking though, because they intentionally lowered Ohio St. for losing to Oregon given that Oregon had the same number of losses.  With this logic (not mine), it’s better to lose to 2-loss Oregon than 1-loss Oregon.  None of this really matters if they beat Michigan and Wisconsin.  I don’t see any scenario where that wouldn’t be enough to put Ohio St. in the top 4.  Same thing if Michigan beats Ohio St. and Wisconsin.

I didn’t investigate why Appalachian St. went up so much, but I believe it’s because of prior opponents such as U. Miami and Coastal Carolina.  The Mountaineers have a much better strength of schedule than UL-Lafayette.  The reason the “weighted” ratings are so named is they provide extra points as the scores of the best opponents improve, so it’s harder to see the direct correlation between what happened last week and the new ratings.  Also, the loss to Texas hurts UL-Lafayette (who didn’t play Coastal Carolina) more every week.  The Ragin’ Cajuns play the Mountaineers on Championship Saturday anyway, so they can confirm if they really are better.

The only other movement that may seem a little strange is San Diego St. dropping three spots.  The Aztecs played UNLV, so they didn’t get many points from that, and other teams were able to pass them.  There was a similar logic to Texas A&M falling two spots.

Anyway, this is basically the formula I’m going to follow the rest of the year.  The only slight tweak is that it’s not a perfect average between the weighted and unweighted ratings, the latter of which make up maybe 55% of the overall rating.  I could change the weighted formula so the bonus points aren’t so high, but it’s just easier to do it this way.

I noticed based on the Massey comparison site that I give the majority of the MAC better ratings than the other ratings represented on Massey’s site (at least as of Sunday evening). I double-checked every team to see if there was any problem and couldn’t find one.

rank team last
1 Georgia 1
2 Notre Dame 2
3 Oklahoma St. 6
4 Cincinnati 4
5 Alabama 5
6 Ohio St. 7
7 Michigan 3
8 Wisconsin 10
9 Ole Miss 12
10 B. Young 9
11 UTSA 15
12 Baylor 16
13 Oklahoma 18
14 Iowa 14
15 Michigan St. 11
16 App. State 22
17 Boise St. 19
18 Wake Forest 8
19 UL-Lafayette 20
20 SDSU 17
21 Oregon 13
22 Utah 25
23 Texas A&M 21
24 Purdue 24
25 Houston
     

Out of Rankings: (23) Utah St.

1-130 computer ratings

2021 Week 11 Top 25

In College Football, College Football Playoff, Rankings, Rankings Commentary on November 14, 2021 at 5:43 PM

NOTE: These rankings have been redone, so some of this commentary is moot. I had subtracted extra points for losses, but upon reflection, I believe consistency is a better approach. The main team that I thought justified doing so only moved a couple of spots anyway.

I spent a lot of time considering what the best approach is for this week. When in doubt, I think it’s better to follow the recommendations given to me by incorporating what I call the weighted formula of my ratings. Rather than giving each team a score based on wins relative to strength of schedule and a set amount for beating or losing to a team of a certain quality and leaving it at that, the weighted formula gives additional credit for beating very good teams.

I do think the less “big” games don’t get enough attention though (such as the “conventional wisdom” regarding teams like Oregon… more on that in a moment), so I only consider the weighted ratings as part of the overall picture. I think it’s too distorted to look at them by themselves. The overall rating is a sort of average between the two placed on a 10-point scale. Since Georgia is the clear #1 in both, I set their value at 10 exactly. I think this makes it easier for an outside observer to understand what the numbers mean.

In hindsight, I probably shouldn’t have let Alabama go up so many spots last week. I didn’t even look up their opponent this week. Although they went almost down to where they were before (New Mexico St. isn’t much more valuable than a bye week), I decided to only drop the Tide one spot below last week. Arkansas (Alabama’s next opponent) is a good bit better than SMU (Cincinnati’s opponent) or Texas Tech (Oklahoma St.’s opponent). Weird coincidence that all three are playing former Southwest Conference teams. Arkansas would be #25 if I strictly followed the computer.

Ohio St. is the other team I decided to keep the Tide ahead of. The Buckeyes have the best pair of opponents for the last two weeks of the regular season of any team; but with the degree of difficulty in winning both (and the fact that one is currently ahead), I think it’s fair to keep them where they are. I don’t mind if Ohio St. makes a leap after one or both wins.

Although neither opponent is bad, Cincinnati has the second-worst pair of opponents among teams that I think should be under consideration for the playoff.

The worst pair of opponents belongs to Notre Dame. I think the Irish would beat Georgia Tech and Stanford even if their coaches and top players stayed home.

So given the weakness of Cincinnati’s and Notre Dame’s remaining schedules (they get even worse when you consider Notre Dame will not be invited to a conference championship and Cincinnati will play the American West champion) and given the likelihood of at least one loss for Ohio St. in the coming few weeks, I thought it was good to keep them where they are for now.

Why keep Notre Dame so high though? One reason is although Michigan is better than Ohio St. right now, I am not confident enough in the Wolverines beating Ohio St. to put the Wolverines #2. Alabama would be too high relative to their computer rating to be #2 and also has an above-average chance of losing. Oklahoma St. has too high of risk of losing “Bedlam” and/or the Big XII championship. In short, I’m comfortable keeping Notre Dame where they are because (although I expect them to slip) they’ve already beaten the several teams most likely to beat them. Michigan and Oklahoma St. haven’t even played the single respective teams most likely to beat them.

Kyren Williams of Notre Dame stretches for a 20-yard touchdown that put the Irish up 21-0 before halftime on Saturday in Charlottesville. Williams led all rushers for 70 total yards. Notre Dame may have peaked relative to other teams, but I believe they’re a deserving #2 at the moment.

Oregon did a little bit better with the weighted rankings, but there is only so much credit I’m willing to give for a single game. They play fairly good (but not great) opponents in the final weeks, but I don’t see the Ducks joining what I think the Playoff conversation should be without significant upsets, such as Notre Dame or Cincinnati losing one of those games, such as Michigan losing to Maryland and then beating Ohio St., such as a loss by Alabama, such as a 2- or 3-loss team winning the Big XII. Every team in front of them doesn’t have to lose but a lot do.

One reason teams like Oregon are higher now is that I decided to punish a little more for losses. Wisconsin has three, so that’s why the Badgers have fallen despite being a very good team in recent weeks. (The Buckeyes shouldn’t exactly be cocky against them either.) The Badgers also don’t have wins over particularly impressive teams, which is a limitation in the weighted formula.

Texas A&M also has three losses now. Like Oregon, the Aggies do have the one impressive win. Also like Oregon, one struggles to be even mildly impressed with the other wins. They beat Auburn (who now has 4 losses, and Bama would make 5) at home; but LSU (who may well finish with 7 losses) should have done the same and Mississippi St. dominated at Auburn (in the second half anyway). TAMU’s non-divisional schedule is hard to be impressed with: Kent St., Colorado (whom they only beat 10-7), New Mexico, Missouri, South Carolina, and Prairie View. Anyway, the reasons for their fall go a lot deeper than losing to Ole Miss. A couple of weeks ago, A&M went up 10 spots in one week. In hindsight, that shouldn’t have happened.

The Aggies remain ahead of Arkansas and Mississippi St., the other two opponents who beat them. This was regardless of whether I rigidly followed the computers, but I did decide for the purposes of the transition to keep A&M ahead of the newly added teams. Usually I don’t have transitions like this so late in the season, but I usually do a lot of things that I haven’t been able to do. It’s been a weird couple of years… in these challenging times, etc.

rank team last
1 Georgia 1
2 Notre Dame 2
3 Michigan 4
4 Cincinnati 5
5 Alabama 3
6 Oklahoma St. 6
7 Ohio St. 7
8 Wake Forest 12
9 B. Young 8
10 Wisconsin 11
11 Michigan St. 13
12 Ole Miss 17
13 Oregon 15
14 Iowa 16
15 TX-San Anton’ 14
16 Baylor 19
17 San Diego St. 18
18 Oklahoma 10
19 Boise St. 24
20 UL-Lafayette 22
21 Texas A&M 9
22 App. State —
23 Utah St. —
24 Purdue 20
25 Utah —

Out of top 25: (21) Penn St.. (23) Auburn, (25) Pittsburgh

2021 Weeks 9 and 10 Top 25

In College Football, Post-game, Preview, Rankings, Rankings Commentary on November 8, 2021 at 4:04 PM

Week 9

As I mentioned in the last blog, I was coming back from vacation this week. I was able to get the computer ratings for last week done, but it was too late to write a blog. With the complications of coming back and my other obligations in life, I wasn’t able to feel caught up on work enough to even start working on the ratings (for Week 9) until after 5 on Friday.

I did want to make a couple of comments about last week. I think after Georgia, it was more appropriate to list the best few major undefeated ahead of Notre Dame and Michigan. Michigan had lost to Michigan St., so that part was obvious. I guess the computer was trying to tell me something, but it seemed like a good idea at the time.

This was what I considered to be the top 10 going into Week 10:

1. Georgia
2. Michigan St.
3. Wake Forest
4. Michigan
5. Cincinnati
6. Notre Dame
7. Ohio St.
8. Alabama
9. Oklahoma
10. Oklahoma St.

Wake Forest was already in the top 3 of the computer in Week 8, so I didn’t do anything special there. Michigan St. and Cincinnati were placed ahead of teams they beat. Since Oklahoma didn’t beat any really good teams in a single game AND doesn’t have a series of good wins (and struggled in some of their poorer wins), I didn’t move them ahead of anyone by virtue of being undefeated. By the way, expect Cincinnati to fall down on my list even if they don’t lose.

Screen Shot 2021-11-08 at 3.47.30 PM

Michigan St. RB Kenneth Walker III (9) runs through the secondary in the second half in East Lansing on October 30. Walker ran for nearly 200 yards in the game. The Spartans then played Purdue, apparently the worst possible opponent after a big win.

I understand the argument that if two teams are roughly similar, you put the head-to-head winner first. That’s part of the reason why Michigan St. and Cincinnati were ahead of Notre Dame and Michigan. That logic doesn’t apply to Oregon and Ohio St. The computer separated the two by 8 spots (now 9). Losing to a team that’s 7-1 should hurt a lot less than losing to a team that was 3-5 going into Week 10 (and now has a sixth loss), and the quality of wins are also not really close even with Oregon having the one good one. I don’t think there are any other good teams in the Pac-12. “Fair to middling” basically describes the whole conference apart from Oregon and winless Arizona. The rest had between 2 and 5 wins going into the week.

“Why play the game” is a non-argument. As a result of playing the game, Oregon is in the top 20 and Ohio St. is not in the top 5. Why give one week more importance than the other 8? I guess that’s not as simple and cliché, so not as many people will mindlessly repeat it.

Forty percent of the top 50 teams in Week 9 either had a bye or a loss, so there was some turnover as the natural sorting-out process takes place. Also, this was the first week where no team had an extra playing week due to having played in “week zero”, so that helps make the ratings more in line with quality of play. Except for Army, who has an extra playing week after conference championships to make up for two byes so far, all teams had either 8 or 9 playing weeks going into Week 10.

Beyond the top 10 I just followed the same order as the computer had going into this week (meaning Week 10). You can go to the ratings page or just determine what last week’s list looked like with the “previous” column below.

Hopefully the rest of the season and next year will be back to normal. I don’t usually have two full vacations during football season, but they were both a long time in the making. Even though the “15 days to flatten the curve” was nearly 20 months ago, I’m also still feeling a domino effect from that in both personal and work schedules.

Week 10

Moving onto the current week, I know Alabama jumped what might seem like an inordinate number of spots for beating (not very impressively) LSU, but the Tigers are better than Indiana (Michigan’s opponent), Nebraska (Ohio St.’s opponent), and Tulane (Cincinnati’s opponent). Michigan St. and Wake Forest both lost, so that accounts for all 5 spots. With the amount of data we now have as far as wins and losses, how impressive a game was on the field or in the final score doesn’t really matter at this point.

It also helps Alabama that Texas A&M has played well since their meeting with the Tide. The Aggies had another one of the more significant gains after beating Auburn, another team LSU finished one score behind, by the way.

Although Navy isn’t a great opponent either, Notre Dame was a solid enough #2 despite the loss to Cincinnati earlier in the season. I didn’t think it made sense to unconditionally keep Cincinnati ahead based on that one game. It also doesn’t help Cincinnati that Indiana just keeps losing. That was their other big foray into major competition. Nonetheless, I did move the Bearcats up two spots from the computer list to keep them at #5. I suspect that we will see other teams like Alabama pass up both the Irish and the Bearcats anyway.

I also moved up Oklahoma from the computer list. The Sooners had lost a few spots due to the bye week. They have two potentially big opponents for points left though, Baylor and Oklahoma St. I would think that they are likely to beat Baylor, but I wouldn’t bet a house on it.

Usually at this point of the season, I don’t make any changes after the top 10, but I did make an exception at #25. If North Carolina St. is able to beat Wake Forest, they’ll be in easily next week. If not, I don’t like for a team to join the top 25 for the first time just to fall out right away for losing to a higher-rated team.

The Wolfpack are overrated in most rankings because they beat an overrated Clemson team back in September. Clemson plays Wake Forest in two weeks, so we will also see what they and the Demon Deacons are really made of. I think it’s safe to say Clemson isn’t really one of the top 10 teams regardless though (they were ranked #9 before the NC St. game).

Although I did complete the Week 9 computer ratings Friday night and the Week 10 ratings Sunday morning, this blog was delayed because I noticed I had a discrepancies with the records. If you’re interested in the technicalities, I’ll elaborate. If not, feel free to skip to the top 25.

Corrections

The only affected team in or close to any computer top 25s was Oklahoma St., but with the way the formula works, they were affected the least. The week they beat Missouri St., it essentially went down as beating a winless FBS team instead (except without hurting the strength of schedule). Since Missouri St. has six wins within the FCS, they count for more than a winless FBS opponent. The Cowboys gained two spots with the change, but I still preferred to put Michigan and Cincinnati ahead below.

Something similar happened with the Wyoming Cowboys. I had to start with A (Air Force) and go all the way down the alphabet to find that mistake. The good news is I was forced to double check every schedule. I did not double check each of the 600+ games that were played to make sure the right opponent was entered (each team has a number designation and on rare occasions I’ll enter the wrong number), but there is an entry for each win and loss. Since there weren’t any positives to counteract the lost win, those Cowboys lost two spots instead.

So this meant there were two teams with extra losses, Florida St. and Tulane. These were affected more dramatically, but thankfully it was two teams that were not even in the top 95, not to mention the top 25. If I give a team an extra loss but don’t set up my spreadsheet for that loss, it results in a disproportionately large number being subtracted.

Notre Dame played Florida St., and both Cincinnati and Oklahoma have played Tulane, so those three have benefited most from these adjustments among teams that I would say are competing for the Playoff. Notre Dame and Cincinnati benefited even more from the increase in opponents’ opponents’ quality.

I think what happened in Tulane’s case was that I lost track of losses because there were so many. Also, I didn’t catch the missing bye week because the Green Wave had played two games on Thursdays (one before and one after the bye). Tulane went up 9 spots to #116.

In Florida St.’s case, I think I accidentally counted the loss to Jacksonville St. twice. Normally an FCS opponent gets put in a separate category, but not when it’s a loss. Maybe the Seminoles deserved two losses for that game anyway. With the correction, Florida St. went up 17 spots to #98.

Final Notes and Week 10 Top 25

Anyway, since all of that is now sorted out and I don’t have any major time constraints, I might see how the weighted ratings look next week. These give teams extra credit for performance against very good opponents. I think they bring my ratings closer to what the Playoff committee looks at.

I don’t like to look at that before this time of year because the top teams are still too volatile (for instance, I’m glad I didn’t give a team a ton of credit for having played Michigan St. or Wake Forest in the Week 9 ratings).

Rank/Team/Last

1 Georgia 1
2 Notre Dame 6
3 Alabama 8
4 Michigan 4
5 Cincinnati 5
6 Oklahoma St. 10
7 Ohio St. 7
8 B. Young 11
9 Texas A&M 19
10 Oklahoma 9
11 Wisconsin 16
12 Wake Forest 3
13 Michigan St. 2
14 TX-San Antonio 17
15 Oregon 14
16 Iowa 13
17 Ole Miss 21
18 San Diego St. 20
19 Baylor 12
20 Purdue
21 Penn St.
22 UL-Lafayette
23 Auburn 15
24 Boise St.
25 Pittsburgh

Out of rankings: (18) Kentucky, (22) Air Force, (23) Fresno St., (24) Minnesota, (25) Appalachian St.

2021 Week 8 Top 25

In College Football, Rankings, Rankings Commentary on October 24, 2021 at 2:34 PM

The computer rankings are still a little more volatile than I’d like, so there are still some manual adjustments on my part, though not as much as last week. Part of the reason is that the middle of the top 25 is very close together.  This is why Penn St. fell 11 spots, which is unusual when it’s almost November, even though Illinois is a pretty bad team to lose to.  Auburn fell 7 spots just for having a bye week.  I was merciful to both and put them both a spot higher below, but that was mostly because I didn’t think it made sense for Virginia to jump ahead.  It’s not like Georgia Tech (the Cavs’ opponent on Saturday) is a powerhouse right now. Also, they will have the opportunity to prove me wrong against any of their next three opponents, who are all currently ranked.

For illustration of how close the middle of the rankings are, Michigan is further ahead of Wake Forest (#3 in the computer ratings) in points than #9 Kentucky is ahead of #20 BYU.  Also, #10 Oklahoma is as far ahead of #23 Auburn as #1 Georgia is ahead of #2 Michigan. 

Illinois WR Casey Washington celebrates the winning catch in the 9th “overtime”/6th round of 2-point conversion shootout in State College, PA, yesterday.

Speaking of which, Oklahoma once again didn’t look much better than one of the worst teams in the computer ratings.  In week 1, the Sooners were a score away from losing to now-#127 (that’s 4th-to-last) Tulane at home.  Yesterday in Lawrence, #115 Kansas led OU going into the fourth quarter and was within one score until the final minute of the game.  Anyway, I guess reasonable that Oklahoma isn’t that far statistically from the bottom of the top 25 even though they look secure if you just look at the number of spots. 

It’s also a reminder that being near the bottom of the list doesn’t mean a team is not capable.  You can understand why a team like Tulane was bowl-eligible a couple of years ago.  This is why it doesn’t bother me that undefeated teams that aren’t very tested on paper have found their way in to the top 20.  There may be a few teams near the bottom pf FBS and some FCS opponents who aren’t as capable as Tulane and Kansas, but a good record is more meaningful to me now than it used to be since this year has shown just how deep the capable teams go. It might have something to do with good players who don’t get a chance at the top schools being able to find a team in the transfer portal, I’m not sure.

As I indicate in the intro to the computer ratings, it will likely be over a week before you hear from me again.  I will try to figure out a better way of publishing them than what I have now.

I made the right decision not to include either Western Michigan or North Carolina St. in my list last week. I made a similar judgment this week. I decided to keep Arkansas in the rankings in lieu of replacing them with Wisconsin. It will be interesting to see if the Razorbacks can return to their level of play against Texas A&M. Regardless, the Badgers have an opportunity to get the necessary points against Iowa.

Top 25

rank team last
1 Georgia 1
2 Michigan 2
3 Alabama 9
4 Wake Forest 13
5 Cincinnati 5
6 Oklahoma St. 3
7 Iowa 7
8 Oklahoma 4
9 Kentucky 6
10 Michigan St. 8
11 Notre Dame 11
12 Ohio St. 12
13 Ole Miss 14
14 San Diego St. 22
15 Baylor 16
16 TX-San Antonio 21
17 Texas A&M 23
18 Oregon 24
19 Pittsburgh 18
20 B. Young 19
21 Penn St. 10
22 Auburn 15
23 Virginia —
24 Air Force 17
25 Arkansas 25

Out of top 25: (20) Purdue

2021 Week 7 Top 25

In College Football, Rankings, Rankings Commentary on October 23, 2021 at 3:48 AM

Obviously the ideal is not to publish my rankings on Saturday morning, but I was so close to completing all the team records for the first round of my computer formula I had to finish. 

I did a pretty good job of anticipating how this might look with my rankings last week; but I still didn’t want to abruptly transition to following the computer formula to a T, especially since I didn’t complete every component of the computer rating yet.

To be more specific about what I looked at (skip this paragraph if you don’t care for technical details), this is only the unweighted portion of the formula.  I use the weighted formula more to differentiate the top teams at the end of the season.  Also, I did not go through the records of the FCS/I-AA teams.  I just gave them all a record of 1-1 unless they were completely winless. I wanted to make sure a completely winless FCS team didn’t count for more than a completely winless FBS team, although both winless FBS teams (Arizona and UNLV) lost to FCS opponents anyway.  In this year more than other recent seasons, it seems the bottom of the FBS is worse than the top of the FCS.  There are a few other FBS teams whose only wins were over FCS opponents.  I think they rate similarly as opponents to the generic FCS opponent’s rating I gave.

Anyway, as a result of this being part of the transitional phase, I allowed some deviation from the computer formula.  I did not move any team more than 4 spots from where the computer placed them.  I didn’t move any of the top 6 more than one spot from where the computer had them.  There was a little bit of subjectivity here and there, but mostly the changes to ranking were (1) to give deference to the teams with fewer losses, and (2) to avoid drastic swings from last week to this week without something that happened on the field to justify it. 

For instance, congratulations to Texas-San Antonio for beating Memphis (which beat Mississippi St., which beat Texas A&M, which beat Alabama) earlier in the season, but nothing about beating Rice should catapult you from not being considered at all into the top 20.  They were one of only a couple of teams that I moved down the maximum number of spots. 

In the most decisive major upset of the season, Purdue put a stop to the Iowa offense in a 24-7 win in Iowa City last Saturday. In the above picture, Purdue DT Branson Deen brings down Iowa QB Spencer Petras. One of Purdue’s Twiter accounts said the Boilermakers beat the #2 out of the Hawkeyes.

Another was Iowa.  The Hawkeyes are somewhat overrated by the system because they have not had a bye week and have not played an FCS opponent.  I have a feeling the loss to Purdue may weigh them down more as the season goes on as well.  I moved two undefeated teams (Cincinnati and Oklahoma) and one 1-loss team (Kentucky, whose only loss was to clear #1 Georgia on the road) ahead of Iowa.  Even if Purdue is better than I think (and this isn’t just a somewhat bizarre outcome like when the Boilermakers beat Ohio St. a few years ago), it definitely makes sense to look more negatively at a loss to them than a loss to Georgia.

By the way, I wanted to mention that Georgia is such a “good loss”, that a team could lose to them twice and still not be penalized as many points as they would be for a loss to Mississippi St.

I decided not to put Michigan St. ahead of iowa since the Spartans have a bye week, which usually causes teams to drop in the ratings anyway.  Also, all of the teams the Spartans have beaten so far have losing records, at least the way I calculate it.  There is no strong reason to believe they would have a better record with Iowa’s schedule.  They very well could have three losses against Iowa’s schedule, in fact.  The Spartans have plenty of opportunity left to prove themselves.  Four of their five remaining opponents are ranked in this list, and three of those are in the top 12. If they make it through that with no losses (or maybe one loss), there is a good chance they can settle their differences with Iowa on the field in the Big Ten Championship anyway.

Also, I kept Michigan St., Alabama, Penn St., and Notre Dame in the same order I had them last week.  The computer did not have them in that order, but that’s part of the logical transition in my mind.  Ohio St. was after Notre Dame; and the Buckeyes do have a loss to a lower team anyway, so I didn’t mind taking them out of order compared to last week. 

I prefer not to put any new entrants above #15, so that required a couple of adjustments compared to the computer as well.  Also, I didn’t want Oregon to fall from #15 all the way out. Stanford isn’t very good, but some shady things went on in that game.  The computer doesn’t care of course, and ultimately the computer wins; but for now I think it’s accurate to keep Oregon in the top 25.

Overall, I’m satisfied that I was able to do this without either deviating a lot from the computer or from last week’s list.  Often the first week where I’m this loyal to the computer as the most turnover by far, but five is a very reasonable number.  I had six new teams two weeks ago, and five two weeks before that.  Also, no team moved more than 10 spots on paper.  I don’t know for sure who my #26 team was last week, but it could well have been Baylor. 

I’m only using one picture because I want to get this up and take my morning nap before the games start.  Hopefully the uninterrupted stretches of text aren’t too unpleasant to gaze upon.

Top 25

rank team last
1 Georgia 1
2 Michigan 3
3 Oklahoma St. 4
4 Oklahoma 5
5 Cincinnati 7
6 Kentucky 6
7 Iowa 2
8 Michigan St. 9
9 Alabama 10
10 Penn St. 11
11 Notre Dame 12
12 Ohio St. 8
13 Wake Forest 13
14 Ole Miss 17
15 Auburn 25
16 Baylor —
17 Air Force —
18 Pittsburgh —
19 B. Young 16
20 Purdue —
21 TX-San Antonio —
22 San Diego St. 22
23 Texas A&M 24
24 Oregon 15
25 Arkansas 19

Out of top 25: (14) Coastal Car., (18) Arizona St., (20) Texas, (21) Florida, (23) SMU

2021 Week 6 Top 25

In College Football, Post-game, Rankings, Rankings Commentary on October 15, 2021 at 2:19 PM

Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to make much progress on my computer ratings. I didn’t want to just keep making case-by-case changes in the rankings though, so I followed a simpler process. For about the first 18 teams I looked at how many wins their FBS opponents had, and I subtracted the number of losses (if any) the teams who beat them suffered. In a few cases, I kept teams in the previous order if they weren’t too far apart (such as Kentucky being ranked after Oklahoma and Oklahoma St.). Michigan was too far ahead in my impromptu formula though, and I can already tell the Wolverines will have some good opponents’ opponents ratings.

After the best undefeated and one-loss teams, I added the best two-loss teams without following the same process. Texas A&M was not in my estimation one of the best two-loss teams because losses came to Arkansas (who has two losses themselves, albeit to good teams) and Mississippi St. (who lost to Memphis and LSU, two teams that are not even close to being ranked).

Likewise, Alabama fell farther than they did in other rankings because of how unimpressive the Aggies had been prior to the game. In mid-October, I don’t give teams like Alabama credit for the last decade or so. As much as possible, I try to restrict all considerations to what has happened on the field this season. See the stats cited in the caption below.

Texas A&M QB Zach Calzada isn’t normally a rushing threat but gained 11 yards on this play in College Station on Saturday. In two previous starts against SEC opponents, Calzada threw 46 passes for 286 yards with one touchdown and two interceptions. Against Alabama, he threw 31 passes for 285 yards with three touchdowns and one interception.

Don’t get me wrong: Alabama absolutely can come back and win the West if not the national championship. That doesn’t change the fact that their pass defense was just made to look worse than New Mexico’s (who Calzada threw fewer yards against; also, the Lobos sacked him three times while the Tide could not sack him at all), so it doesn’t bother me to drop them to #10 even subjectively.

The fact that I’m not giving credit for status is also part of the reason Ohio St. continued to fall. Another reason was that I’m no longer going to punish teams like Kentucky just because I happen to be more skeptical that the Wildcats can make the College Football Playoff than I am that the Buckeyes can.

Other teams went up as I’ve begun to attach less importance to margin of victory. This is why Notre Dame went up a spot while most one-loss teams went down. I can promise you it has nothing do with the history of the program.

rank team last
1 Georgia 2
2 Iowa 5
3 Michigan 14
4 Oklahoma St. 8
5 Oklahoma 12
6 Kentucky 18
7 Cincinnati 4
8 Ohio St. 6
9 Michigan St. 17
10 Alabama 1
11 Penn St. 3
12 Notre Dame 13
13 Wake Forest 23
14 Coastal Car. 10
15 Oregon 7
16 B. Young 9
17 Ole Miss 16
18 Arizona St. 20
19 Arkansas 11
20 Texas 15
21 Florida 19
22 San Diego St. 22
23 SMU —
24 Texas A&M —
25 Auburn 21
Out of rankings: (24) Texas Tech, (25) W. Michigan

2021 Week 5 Top 25

In College Football, Rankings, Rankings Commentary on October 8, 2021 at 5:50 PM

rank team last
1 Alabama 1
2 Georgia 2
3 Penn St. 4
4 Cincinnati 7
5 Iowa 8
6 Ohio St. 6
7 Oregon 3
8 Oklahoma St. 14
9 B. Young 9
10 Coastal Car. 10
11 Arkansas 11
12 Oklahoma 12
13 Notre Dame 13
14 Michigan 17
15 Texas 15
16 Ole Miss 16
17 Michigan St. 18
18 Kentucky —
19 Florida 5
20 Arizona St. —
21 Auburn —
22 San Diego St. 25
23 Wake Forest —
24 Texas Tech —
25 W. Michigan —

Out of rankings: (19) Texas A&M, (20) Baylor, (21) Fresno St., (22) Louisville, (23) C. Florida, (24) UCLA

I don’t really have time to elaborate. I will try to get my computer rankings online this weekend, so I want to allow as much time as possible to work on those. Usually I have them started earlier, but it’s been hard to get back into the habit of things this year.

I had a general rule of no 2-loss teams; but I had to make an exception with Florida, who had two close losses, both to currently undefeated teams (including by 2 points to Alabama, my #1).

Kentucky’s Chris Rodriguez, Jr., scored what turned out to be the winning points in the fourth quarter in Lexington on Saturday. It was the Wildcats’ first home win over the Gators since 1986.